Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Influence of Socio Economic Variables on Domestic Cooking Energy Choices of Rural Poor Households
Current Issue
Volume 5, 2018
Issue 1 (February)
Pages: 1-6   |   Vol. 5, No. 1, February 2018   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 57   Since Mar. 13, 2018 Views: 1185   Since Mar. 13, 2018
Authors
[1]
Nsikak-Abasi A. Etim, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.
[2]
Dorothy Thompson, Department of Home Economics, Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.
[3]
Christian E. Etefia, Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria.
Abstract
Many households in developing countries are energy poor and are unable to make appropriate choices for cooking and heating. Because access to affordable and reliable energy source is essential for poverty reduction, it becomes imperative to understand the factors influencing households choice of cooking energy. This study investigated some socio-economic factors influencing the cooking energy choices of rural poor households. Through the multi-stage sampling procedure, the representative households were selected for the study. With the aid of questionnaire, primary data were collected from 120 households. Based on the household survey data, multinomial logit model was employed to estimate the factors influencing household choice of cooking energy. Results of analysis revealed that the most critical factors influencing domestic cooking energy choices included age of household head, housing type, household size, educational level, household income, occupation of household head and price of cooking energy. Results revealed that the choice of fuel wood as cooking energy indicate a negative relationship with age of household head, household type and household income at one percent level of significance. Findings further revealed that educational level of household heads was negatively related to choice of fuel wood and significant (p<0.05). For choice of kerosene, findings showed that age, household size, household income and price of kerosene were positively related the choice of kerosene and were significant (p<0.01) respectively. Improving the educational level of rural households and reducing the price of liquefied petroleum gas will be a rational policy decision to encourage the use of cleaner and efficient energy.
Keywords
Cooking, Domestic, Energy, Households
Reference
[1]
Baiyegunhi, L. J. S. and Hassan, M. B. (2014). Rural Household fuel energy transition: evidence from Giwa LGA Kaduna State, Nigeria. Energy Sustainable Development 20: 30-35.
[2]
Banos, R., Manzano-Agugliaro, F., Montoya, F. G. C., Akayde, A. and Gomez, J. (2011). Optimization methods applied to renewable and sustainable energy: A Review Renewable Sustainable Energy Review. 15: 1753-1766.
[3]
Bisu, D. Y., Kuhe, A and Lortyer, H. A. (2016). Urban household cooking energy choice: an example of Bauchi metropolis, Nigeria. Energy, Sustainability and Society 6 (15) 1: 1-12.
[4]
Chukwu, P. U. Ibrahim, I. U. Ojosu, J. O. and Iortyer, H. A. (2014). Sustainable energy future for Nigeria: the role of engineers J. sustainable Dev. Studies 692: 242-259.
[5]
Demurger, S. and Fournier, M. (2010). Poverty and firewood consumption: A case study of rural households in northern China. Grouped’Analyseet de TheorieEnconomique Lyon- St. Etienne WP 1020.
[6]
ESMAP (Energy Sector Management Assistance Program) (2007). Strategy to Alleviate the Pressure of fuel demand on national wood fuel Resources. Haiti.
[7]
Geremew, K., Gedefaw, M., Dagnew, Z. and Jara (2014). Current and correlates of traditional cooking energy sources utilisation in urban setting in the context of climate change and health, North West Ethiopia: A case of Debre Markos Town.
[8]
Heltberg, R. (2003). Household fuel and energy use in developing countries – A multicountry study” Oil and gas policy division, The World Bank, Washington DC.
[9]
Judge, G. C., Hill R. C., Griffiths W. E., Lutkepohl H. and Lee T. C. (1985). Theory and practice of Econometrics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
[10]
Kees, M. and Feldmann, L. (2011). The role of donor organization.
[11]
Kippra (2010). A comprehensive study and analysis of fuel consumption patterns in Kenya. Nairobi.
[12]
Kwakwa, P. A., Debrah, E. and Alhassan, H. (2013). Households Energy Choice in Ghana. Journal of Empirical Economics 1 (3): 96-103.
[13]
Lambe (2015). Can carbon finance transform household energy markets? A review of cook stove projects and programs in Kenya. Energy Research and Social Sciences 5: 55-66.
[14]
Manyo-Plange, N. C. (2011). The Changing Climate of Household Energy. Determinants of Cooking Fuel Choice in Domestic Setting in Axim, Ghana. Retrieved from http://www.cleancookstoves.org/resources-files/the-changing-climate -ofpdf.
[15]
Massawe, F. A., Bengesi, K. M. K., Kweka, A. E. (2015). Patterns of Household Cooking Energy and Associated Factors: Experience from Kilimanjaro Region, Tanzania.
[16]
MC Fadden D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P. (ed), Economic Theory and Mathematical Economics. Academic Press, New York.
[17]
Nnaji, C. E., Uzoma, C. C, and Chukwu, J. O. (2012). An Analysis of factors Determining fuel wood use for cooking by Rural Households in Nsukka area of Enugu State, Nigeria. Continental Journal of Environmental Sciences 6 (2): 1-6. Wilolud Journals.
[18]
Ogwumike, F. O. Ozughalu U. M. and Abiona, G. A. (2014). Household energy use and determinants: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Energy Econ. Policy 4 (2): 248-262.
[19]
Osiolo, H. (2009). Enhancing household fuel choice and substitution in Kenya, Kippra Discussion Paper No, 102.
[20]
Oyedepo, O. (2012). Energy and Sustainable Development in Nigeria: The way forward. Energy Sustain Soc 2: 15.
[21]
Pundo, M. O. and Fraser, G. C. G. (2006). Multinomial logit analysis of household cooking fuel choice in rural Kenya: The case of Kisumu district 4591): 24-37.
[22]
Saeed, S. H. and Sharma D. K. (2012). Non-conventional energy resources. KATSON Books, New Delhi.
[23]
Smil (1990). Renewable and Energy for Rural Development: New and Innovative ways of delivering Energy services to the rural areas.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved