Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
A Comparison of Bayesian and Classical Approach for Estimating the Parameter of Rayleigh Distribution
Current Issue
Volume 5, 2018
Issue 3 (September)
Pages: 40-46   |   Vol. 5, No. 3, September 2018   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 31   Since Aug. 5, 2018 Views: 1073   Since Aug. 5, 2018
Authors
[1]
Janardan Mahanta, Department of Statistics, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
[2]
Mst. Bilkis Ara Talukdar, Department of Statistics, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh.
Abstract
This paper focuses on the estimating the parameter of Rayleigh distribution (special case of Weibull distribution) by Bayesian approach as well as classical maximum likelihood method. In Bayesian approach loss function is the most ingredient part. Squared error (SE), LINEX, MLINEX loss functions have been used in Bayesian approach. The performance of the obtained estimators for different types of loss functions are then compared among themselves as well as with the classical maximum likelihood estimator. Better result has been observed by Bayesian approach under MLINEX loss function. Mean Square Error (MSE) of the estimators are also computed and presented in graphs.
Keywords
Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLE), Modified Linear Exponential (MLINEX) Loss Function, Linear Exponential (LINEX) Loss Function, Squared Error Loss Function (SE)
Reference
[1]
Ahmed, S. A. and Mahammed, H. O. (2012). A statistical analysis of wind power density based on Weibull and Rayleigh models of “Penjwen Region” Sulaimani / Iraq. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering. 6 (2), pp. 135–140.
[2]
Aslam, M., Tahir, M., Hussain Z. and Al-Zahrani, B. (2007). A three component mixture of Rayleigh Distributions, Properties and Estimation in Bayesian Framework. 10 (5).
[3]
Iriarte, Y. A., Castillo, N. O., Bolfarine, H. and Gomez, H. W. (2018). Modified slashed-Rayleigh distribution. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods. 47 (13).
[4]
Mahanta, J., Biswas, S. C., Roy, M. K., and Islam, M. A. (2015). A Comparison of Bayesian approach and Classical approach for estimating Markov based logistic model, American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 5 (4), pp. 178-183.
[5]
Mahanta J. and Biswas S. C. (2016). Comparison of Bayesian approach and classical approach for estimating the parameter of Markov model. Journal of reliability and statistical studies. 9 (2). pp. 81-90.
[6]
Mahmoud, M. A. W. and Ghazal, M. G. M. (2017). Estimations from the exponentiated Rayleigh distribution based on generalized Type-II hybrid censored data. 25 (1). pp. 71-78.
[7]
Rattanapitikon, W. (2010). Verification of conversion formulas for computing representative wave heights. Ocean Engineering.
[8]
Saleem, M. and Aslam, M. (2008). Bayesian analysis of the two-component mixture of the Rayleigh distribution assuming the uniform and the Jeffreys’ priors. Journal of Applied Statistical Science. 16, pp. 493–502.
[9]
Walck, C.(2007). Hand-book on statistical distributions for experimentalists, University of Stockholm.
[10]
Wahed, A. S. F. and Uddin, M. B. (1998). Bayes estimation under asymmetric loss function, Dhaka University Journal of Sciences. 46 (2), pp. 355-361.
[11]
Zellner, A. (1986). Bayesian estimation and prediction using asymmetric loss functions, Journal of American Statistical Association. 81, pp. 446-451.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved