Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Application of Statistical Design of Experiment and Numerical Optimization in Optimizing the Effects of Selected Input Variables on the Period of Oscillation in an Unsteady Flow Through Surge Chamber
Current Issue
Volume 1, 2014
Issue 2 (May)
Pages: 31-43   |   Vol. 1, No. 2, May 2014   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 31   Since Aug. 28, 2015 Views: 2152   Since Aug. 28, 2015
Authors
[1]
Ilaboya, I. R., University of Benin; Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, PMB 1154, Benin City, Nigeria.
[2]
Oti, E. O., University of Benin; Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, PMB 1154, Benin City, Nigeria.
[3]
Atikpo E., Department of Civil Engineering, Igbinedion University, Okada, Edo State, Nigeria.
[4]
Enamuotor, B. O., Department of Civil Engineering, Delta State University, Abraka, Nigeria.
[5]
Umukoro, L. O., Department of Civil Engineering, Igbinedion University, Okada, Edo State, Nigeria.
Abstract
The focus of the research paper was to study the performance of plint and partners model surge chamber equipment consisting of a large water reservoir supplying a horizontal stainless steel pipeline (penstock) under a constant head arrangement in modeling the behaviour of fluid under unsteady state condition. The inlet valve to the reservoir was opened and adjusted to give some level of discharge from overflow weir for a predetermined period of time. The flow rate of the water was then computed using the volume against time relationship. A surge was then initiated by a sudden closure of the valve and the dynamics of flow was then studied based on the number of complete oscillation (period) that was observed in the surge chamber. critical studies on the effects of selected input variables such as surge tower diameter, time of flow, velocity of flow, and rate of flow on the operational dynamics of unsteady flow in surge chambers was done using design of experiment (DOE) employing the 2-level factorial design with 3 central point’ and one replication. Analysis of the results obtained was done using statistical package (Design Expert Version 7.0). Generation of the optimal equation for both the coded variables and the actual factors including the optimal solution of the selected input variables was done by numerical optimization and the ranking of the variable effects on the response was done using the Pareto chart. The adequacy of the optimal equation was validated using the fisher’s F probability function, coefficient of determination (r2), and the adjusted R square value. The desirability of the model equation obtained reveals that the equation can be applied to any system operating under the same selected condition. Result of numerical optimization shows that, for a complete oscillation period of 15 seconds, the operational conditions needed are; Time of flow (8.20s), flow velocity (409.94m/s), rate of flow (2.34m3/s), and surge diameter (0.08m)
Keywords
Surge Chamber, Numerical Optimization, Design of Experiment, 2-Level Factorial Design, Unsteady Flow, and Coefficient of Determination
Reference
[1]
Wood, F. M., (1937), The Application of Heaviside’s Operational Calculus to the Solution of Problems in Water hammer, Trans. ASME 59, pp. 707–713.
[2]
Rich, G., (1944), Water hammer Analysis by the Laplace-Mellin Transformations, Trans. ASME, pp. 1944–45.
[3]
Rich, G., (1951), Hydraulic Transients, 1st Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, Dover Reprint.
[4]
Parmakian, J., (1955), Water-Hammer Analysis. Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Dover Reprint, 1963.
[5]
Streeter, V. L., and Lai, C., (1963), Water-hammer Analysis Including Fluid Friction, Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 128, pp. 1491–1524.
[6]
Streeter, V. L. and Wylie, E. B., (1967), Hydraulic Transients, McGraw-Hill, New York.
[7]
Chaudhry, M. H., (1987), Applied Hydraulic Transients, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.
[8]
Watters, G. Z., (1984), Analysis and Control of Unsteady Flow in Pipelines, Butterworth, Stoneham, Ma.
[9]
Wylie, E. B. and Streeter, V. L (1984), Fluid Transients, FEB Press, Ann Arbor.
[10]
Vardy, A. E., and Hwang, K. L., (1991), A Characteristic Model of Transient Friction in Pipes, J. Hydraul. Res. 29 (5), pp. 669–685.
[11]
Ghidaoui, M. S. (2001), Fundamental Theory of Water-hammer, Special Issue of the Urban Water J. ~Special Issue on Transients, Guest Editor: B. W. Karney, 1(2), pp. 71–83.
[12]
Walker, J. S., (1975), Perturbation Solutions for Steady One- Dimensional Water-hammer Waves,’’ ASME J. Fluids Eng. 6, pp. 260–262.
[13]
Bergant, A. and Simpson, A. R., (1994), Estimating Unsteady Friction in Transient Cavitating Pipe Flow, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Water Pipeline Systems, Edinburgh, UK, May 24–26, BHRA Group Conf. Series Publ. No. 110, pp. 3–15.
[14]
Axworthy, D. H., Ghidaoui, M. S., and McInnis, D. A., (2000), Extended Thermodynamics Derivation of Energy Dissipation in Unsteady Pipe Flow,’’ J. Hydraul. Eng. 126~4!, pp. 276–287.
[15]
Brunone, B., Karney, B. W., Mecarelli, M., and Ferrante, M., (2000), Velocity Profiles and Unsteady Pipe Friction in Transient Flow, J. Water Resources Planning and Management. 126 (4), pp. 236–244.
[16]
Silva-Araya, W. F., and Chaudhry, M. H., (1997), Computation of Energy Dissipation in Transient Flow, J. Hydraul. Eng. 123 (2), pp.108–115.
[17]
Pezzinga, G., (1999), Quasi-2D Model for Unsteady Flow in Pipe Networks, J. Hydraul. Eng. 125 (7), pp. 676–685.
[18]
Ghidaoui, M. S., and Kolyshkin, A. A., (2001), Stability Analysis of Velocity Profiles in Water-Hammer Flows, J. Hydraul. Eng. 127 (6), pp. 499–512.
[19]
Carstens, M. R., and Roller, J. E., (1959), Boundary-Shear Stress in Unsteady Turbulent Pipe Flow,’’ J. Hydraul. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng. 85 (HY2), pp. 67–81.
[20]
Eichinger, P. and Lein, G., (1992), The Influence of Friction on Unsteady Pipe Flow, Unsteady Flow and Fluid Transients, Bettess and Watts editions, Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 41–50.
[21]
Ghidaoui, M. S., Mansour, S. G. S., and Zhao, M., 2002, ‘‘Applicability of Quasi Steady and Axisymmetric Turbulence Models in Water Hammer,’’ J. Hydraul. Eng. 128 (10), pp. 917–924.
[22]
Vardy, A. E. and Brown, J, M., 1996, ‘‘On Turbulent, Unsteady, Smooth-Pipe Friction, Pressure Surges and Fluid Transient,’’ BHR Group, London, pp. 289–311.
[23]
Brunone, B. and Golia, U. M., 1991, ‘‘Some Considerations on Velocity Profiles in Unsteady Pipe Flows,’’ Proc. Int. Conf. on Enthropy and Energy Dissipation in Water Resources, Maratea, Italy.
[24]
Systat 12 manual, (2007), Statistics I, II, III, IV, by SYSTAT Software, Inc., 225 W. Washington Street, Ste. 425 Chicago, IL 60606.
[25]
Box, G.E.P., and Wilson, K.B., (1951), On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 13, pp 1 -45
[26]
Gupta, V.K., and Rajender, P., (2012), Fundamentals of design of experiments, I.A.S.R.I. library avenue, New Delhi, pp 1-44
[27]
Michael, F.W. F., (2001), Guidelines for the Design and Statistical Analysis of Experiments in Papers Submitted to ATLA, ATLA 29, pp 427.446
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved