Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
An Analysis of the Relationship Between Perceptions of Coastal Communities and CCA Planning
Current Issue
Volume 5, 2018
Issue 1 (March)
Pages: 1-9   |   Vol. 5, No. 1, March 2018   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 70   Since Apr. 27, 2018 Views: 1065   Since Apr. 27, 2018
Davood Mafi-Gholami, Department of Forest Science, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran.
Akram Nouri-Kamari, Department of Environment, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
Eric Zenner, Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA.
In recent years, understanding the limits to adaptation planning resulting from behavioral changes of coastal communities has become one of the most significant elements of climate change vulnerability research in the world. In this study, we examined how perceptions of risk, uncertainty, and trust are related to the support for climate change adaptation (CCA) planning in some coastal communities of Iran. This assessment is based on the analysis of a web-based questionnaire. Participants included city planners and engineers, county and borough planners, non-governmental organizations, and heads of the provincial department in Bushehr, Hormozgan, and Sistan va Baluchestan. Ordinal regression and correlation analysis were used to assess which factors related to support for CCA strategies during two stages of planning (i.e., support for development and support for the allocation of human and financial resources). Findings indicate that a higher level of perceived risk in climate scientists significantly increased the odds that participants more strongly supported local-level CCA strategies. Planners reported that the perceived level of uncertainty for social and decision making process were significantly higher than the perceived level of climate- and environment-related uncertainties. Higher levels of perceived uncertainty did not significantly decrease the odds of a higher level of support for adaptation planning (except for decision making processes related to the support allocating human and financial resources to implement adaptation strategies). There were differences in the strength, direction, and significance of correlations within and among the study areas, highlighting the value in understanding how priorities vary regionally and across levels of management/ government.
Risk, Uncertainty, Trust, CCA Planning, Iran
Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Naess LO, Wolf J, Wreford A. Are There Social Limits to Adaptation to Climate Change? Climatic Change 2009; 93: 335-354.
Moser SC, Ekstrom JA. A Framework to Diagnose Barriers to Climate Change Adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 2010; 107 (51): 22026-22031.
O'Connor RE, Bord RJ, Fisher A, Staneva M, Kozhouharova-Zhivkova V, Dobreva S. Determinants of Support for Climate Change Policies in Bulgaria and the USA. Risk Decision and Policy 1999; 4 (3): 255-269.
Zahran S, Brody SD, Grover H, Vedlitz A. Climate Change Vulnerability and Policy Support. Society and natural Resources 2006; 19: 1-19.
Zahran S, Brody SD, Vedlitz A, Grover H, Miller C. Vulnerability and Capacity: Explaining Local Commitment to Climate Change Policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 2008; 26: 544-562.
Bord R, O'Connor RE, Fisher A. In what Sense does the Public Need to Understand Global Climate Change? Public Understanding of Science 2000; 9: 205-218.
Stern PC. Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues 2000; 56 (3): 407-424.
Pielke RJ, Prins G, Rayner S, Sarewitz D. Lifting the Taboo on Adaptation. Nature 2007; 445: 597-598.
Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGreg DG. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis 2004; 24: 311-322
Moser SC. Impact Assessments and Policy Responses to Sea-Level Raise in Three US States: An Exploration of Human-Dimension Uncertainties. Global Environmental Change 2005; 14: 353-369.
Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye ATJ. Gregory M, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB., Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao ZC. Global Climate Projections. In Climate Change: The Physical Science Basis. contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds. S. Solomon and M. M. D. Qin, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H. L. Miller Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Abbott J. Understanding and Managing the Unknown: The Nature of Uncertainty in Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2005; 24: 237-251.
Laurian L. Trust in Planning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Participatory and Deliberative Planning. Planning theory & practice 2009; 10 (3): 369-391.
MRAG. Systematic Review of the Needs and Issues of the U.S. Coastal Resource Management Community, 53. Charleston, SC: NOAA Coastal Services Center, 2009.
Cullingworth JB, Caves R. Planning in the USA. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009.
APA. Policy Guide on Planning and Climate Change, 95: American Planning Association, 2011.
Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. (Eds.). Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003.
Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: the Tailored Design Method. 2nd Edition ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 2000.
Rasmussen JL. Analysis of Likert-Scale Data: A Reinterpretation of Gregoire and Driver. Psychological Bulletin 1989; 105 (1): 167-170.
Cicchetti DV, Showalter D, Tyrer PJ. The Effect of Number of Rating Scale Categories on Levels of Interrater Reliability: A Monte Carlo Investigation. Applied Psychological Measurement 1985; 9 (1): 31-36.
Carifio J, Perla RJ. Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and Their Antidotes. Journal of Social Sciences 2007; 3 (3): 106-116
Jamieson S. Likert Scales: How to (ab)use Them. Medical Education 2004; 38: 1212-1218.
Gardner HJ, Martin MA. Analyzing Ordinal Scales in Studies of Virtual Environments: Likert or Lump It! Presence 2007; 16 (4): 439-446.
Norman G. Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the "Laws" of Statistics. Advances in Health Science Education 2010; 15: 625-632.
Semenza J, Ploubidis GB, George LA. Climate Change and Climate Variability: Personal Motivation for Adaptation and Mitigation. Environmental Health 2011; 10 (46): 12-17.
Rabinovich A, Morton TA, Birney M. Communicating Climate Science: The Role of Perceived Communicator's Motives. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2012; 32: 11-18.
Tribbia J, Moser, SC. More Than Information: What Coastal Managers Need to Plan for Climate Change. Environmental Science and Policy 2008; 11 (4): 315-328.
Grothmann T, Patt A. Adaptive Capacity and Human Cognition: The Process of Individual Adaptation to Climate Change. Global Environmental Change 2005; 15: 199-213.
Dessai S, O’Brien K, Hulme M. Editorial: on Uncertainty and Climate Change. Global Environmental Change 2007; 17: 1-3.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved