Study on Socio Economic Benefit of Nickel Mining Industry in Southeast Sulawesi Province Indonesia and It’s Impact on Local Economy
[1]
Ukar Wijaya Soelistijo, University of Islam Bandung (UNISBA), Institute of Technology Bandung (ITB), Centre for Education and Training of Mineral and Coal Technology, Bandung, Indonesia.
[2]
Aryo Prawoto Wibowo, Institute of Technology Bandung (ITB), Bandung, Indonesia.
[3]
La Ode Aswandi, Institute of Technology Bandung (ITB), PT Tambang Sejahtera, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Southeast Sulawesi province is located in an area containing large quantity of nickel ore resources. Nickel mining contributes significant socio economic benefit, both direct and indirect ones, for the region. It is indicated that the net present value (NPV) of USD 253,198,822 and benefit cost ratio (BCR) of 2.15 of the nickel mining and benefit of USD 18,240,246 with BCR value of 5.98 on nickel processing activities will provide the province regional economy within the production life of 20 years. The company would gain benefit USD 210,324,423 with BCR value of 1.22. While province will gain a net benefit of USD 39,948,971 with BCR value of 6.19. Based on the net social gain (NSG) analysis model at current prices, net social benefit of nickel mining activities for Southeast Sulawesi Province is USD 4,482,688 as it’s annual average in the 8-year mine life, with the value of net gain coefficient (NGC) of 6.19%, while nickel processing activities will provide net social benefit of $ 47,010,028, on average each year over the 20 year life of the production, with NGC value of 42.36%. Nickel mining and ferronickel processing industry sector has multiplier effect and upstream-downstream linkage numbers relatively low compared with other economic sectors. Mineral processing plant as mandated by Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mineral and Coal Mining, pursued construct at the mine site, so that socio economic benefit of mining is not becoming an opportunity cost for the province. Looking the prospects for future nickel mining industry, the local government is expected to prepare the resources and infrastructure to support the nickel mining and processing activities, which would provide net socio conomic benefit greater, for a long time for the local society. The methodology applied in this study is based on macro and micro economic theory, social-economic benefit cost analysis, shift-share analysis, net social gain and input-output models.
Nickel Resource Development, Extended Cost Benefit Analysis, Net Social Gain, Shift-Share Analysis, Input-Output Models
[1]
Agus, S., (2001). “Manajemen Keuangan, Teoridan Aplikasi.” BPFE, Yogyakarta.
[2]
Alam, A. L., (2013). ”Konvergensi Ekonomi Antar Kabupaten/Kota Di Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara; Peran Dan Kontribusi Sektor Pertambangan.”Tesis Program Studi Rekayasa Pertambangan, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
[3]
Amrullah, A., (2007). “Kajian Peran PT INCO (Tbk) dalam Mendukung Pembangunan Ekonomi Kabupaten LuwuTimur – Sulawesi Selatan Era Otonomi Daerah: Pendekatan Antarindustri.” Tesis Program Studi Rekayasa Pertambangan, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
[4]
Anonymous (a), (2004). “UU No. 34 Tahun 2004, Tentang Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah.”
[5]
Anonymous (a), (2008). “UU No. 36 Tahun 2008, TentangPajakPenghasilan.”
[6]
Anonymous (b), (2009). “UU No. 4 Tahun 2009, Tentang Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara.”
[7]
Anonymous (c), (2011). “PERDA No. 5 Tahun 2011, Tentang Pajak Daerah. Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara.”
[8]
Anonymous (d), (2014). “UU No. 23 Tahun 2014, Tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.”
[9]
Anonymous (e), (2013). “Mineral And Coal 2013.”Direktorat Jenderal Mineral Batubara. Jakarta.
[10]
Anonymous (f), (2013). “Sulawesi Tenggara Dalam Angka Tahun 2013.” BPS Sulawesi Tenggara.
[11]
Anonymous (g), (2014). “Sulawesi Tenggara Dalam Angka Tahun 2014.” BPS Sulawesi Tenggara.
[12]
Anonymous (h), (2012). “Statistik Harga Perdagangan Besar Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara Tahun 2012-2013.” BPS Sulawesi Tenggara.
[13]
Anonymous (i), (2008). “Tabel Input Output Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara Tahun 2006.” BPS Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara, Kendari.
[14]
Anonymous (j), (2013). “Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah Tahun. (2013-2018) Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara.” Kendari.
[15]
Anonymous (k), 2012. “Peraturan Pemerintah RI No. 9 Tentang Jenis Dan Tari fAtas Jenis Penerimaan Negara Bukan Pajak Yang Berlaku Pada Kementerian Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral.” Jakarta.
[16]
Anonymous (l), (2014), “Peraturan Pemerintah RI No. 1 Tentang Perubahan kedua atas peraturan pemerintah No. 23 tahun 2010 tentang pelaksanaan Kegiatan Usaha Pertambangan Mineral dan Batubara”, Jakarta.
[17]
Anonymous (m), (2012). “Laporan Keberlanjutan 2012, Menjadi yang Terbaik di Tengah Tantangan.” PT Aneka Tambang Tbk, Jakarta.
[18]
Beukering, P. Van, Cesar, H., (2001). “Economic valuation of the Leuser Ecosystem on Sumatra, Indonesia: A stakeholder perspective.” Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
[19]
Hartman, L. H., (1987). “Introductory Mining Engineering.” John Wiley & Sons Inc, Canada.
[20]
Mangiri, K., (2000). “Perencanaan Terpadu Pembangunan Ekonomi Daerah Otonom.”Badan Pusat Statistik, Jakarta.
[21]
Mangkoesoebroto, G., (1981).” Ekonomi Publik.” BPFE, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
[22]
Miernyk W. H., (1965). “The Element of Input and Output Analysis.” Random House, New York.
[23]
Miller RE, Blair PD, 2009. “Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions.” Cambridge University Press, New York.
[24]
Neufville, R. D., (1990). “Applied Systems Analysis: Engineering Planning and Technology Management.” McGraw-Hill Publishing Company, New York, U.S.A.
[25]
Norgate, T., Jahanshahi, S. (2010). “Assessing the energy and greenhouse gas footprints of nickel lateritic processing.” Minerals Engineering 24 (2011) 698–707.
[26]
Norgate, T., Jahanshahi, S., Rankin, W. J. (2006). “Assessing the environmental impact of metal production processes.” Journal of Cleaner Production 15 (2007) 838-848.
[27]
Pearson, S. R., (1974). “Commodity Exports and African Economic Developments.” Lexington Books, Canada.
[28]
Richardson, H. W., (1979). “Regional Economics.” University of Illinois Press, Urbana Chicago, London
[29]
Ridwan, F. D., (2007). “Kajian Manfaat PT Antam Pomalaa Terhadap Daerah Kabupaten Kolaka Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara.” Tesis Program Studi Rekayasa Pertambangan, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
[30]
Soelistijo, U. W., (2013). “Prospect Of Potential Nickel Added Value Development in Indonesia.” Earth Science. Vol. 2, No. 6, 2013, pp 129-138.doi : 10.11648/j.earth.20130206.13
[31]
Soelistijo, U. W., (2003). “Ekonomi Regional dan Model Penerapannya: Pengembangan Sumberdaya Mineral dan Energi Dalam Rangka Otonomi Daerah di Indonesia.” Puslitbang Tekmira ESDM, Bandung.
[32]
Sugiyono, (2005). “Metode Penelitian Bisnis, Edisi Keempat.” PT Alfabeta, Bandung.
[33]
Sukirno, S., (2004). “Makroekonomi, Teori Pengantar.” PT Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
[34]
Suparmoko, M., (1997). “Ekonomi Sumberdaya Alamdan Lingkungan.” BPFE, Yogyakarta.
[35]
Wang C., Corbett J. J., (2007). “The Costs And Benefits Of Reducing SO Emissions From Ships In The US West Coastal Waters.” Transportation Research Part D 12 577–588. United States.
[36]
Wibawa H., (2012). “Peranan Subsektor Pertambangan Mineral Dan Batubara Dalam perekonomian Provinsi Banten Tahun 2000-2025; Pendekatan Antarindustr.” Tesis Program Studi Rekayasa Pertambangan, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
[37]
Yani, A., (2011). “Penilaian Ekonomi Kawasan Hutan di Indonesia: Pendekatan Dalam Penentuan Kelayakan Luas Areal Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Melawi, Kalimantan Barat).” Disertasi Program Doktor, Universitas Indonesia.
