Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News Unsubscribe Page
The Governance of Community Forests in Eswatini: The Case of Ezikhotheni and Ngcayini Chiefdoms
Current Issue
Volume 8, 2020
Issue 1 (March)
Pages: 5-18   |   Vol. 8, No. 1, March 2020   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 13   Since Jan. 13, 2020 Views: 64   Since Jan. 13, 2020
Authors
[1]
Saico Sibusiso Singwane, Department of Geography, Environmental Science and Planning, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Eswatini, Manzini, Kingdom of Eswatini.
[2]
Heinrich Beckedahl, .
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the rules governing the management of resources from plantation-style community forests in the Kingdom of Eswatini using Ngcayini and Ezikhotheni chiefdoms as case studies. Data were collected by selecting and interviewing respondents comprising internal and external stakeholders. Internal stakeholders included heads of households, members of the community inner council, Natural Resource Management Committee members, as well as the Inkhundla Local Government Council (Bucopho). External stakeholders included officers in the Forestry Section of the Ministry Tourism and Environmental Affairs (MTEA); officers of the Eswatini Environment Authority (EEA); the Livelihoods Manager for World Vision; and the Director of Environment for Conserve Eswatini. The research findings indicate that access to forest resources is free in natural forests, yet in plantation-style community forests it is controlled by traditional authorities and Natural Resource Management Committees (NRMCs). Furthermore, there are elaborate rules governing the management of community forests in the specific chiefdoms studied (90% Ezikhotheni and 88% at Ngcayini). The rules are formulated by all community members and enforced by community leaders. Despite the elaborate rules, there are challenges of illegal burning and harvesting of resources, as well as the theft of fence materials surrounding the forests and gullies. Nonetheless, perpetrators are generally exposed and reprimanded through levying of fines. In addition, community members indicated knowledge of national policies and legislation relating to the management of community forests.
Keywords
Community Forests, Traditional Authorities, Natural Resource Management Committee, Rules, National Policies, Legislation, Ngcayini, Ezikhotheni
Reference
[1]
Brown, R. (2011). Parliamentary role and relationship in effectively addressing climate change issues in Swaziland: A study commissioned and supported by the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) in partnership with European Parliamentarians for Africa (AWEPA) http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G03058.pdf (14 January 2017).
[2]
Magagula, F. F. (2003). Swaziland Country Paper. In Geldenhuys, C., Castañeda, F., Savenije, H. and Kuzee, M. (Ed). Tropical secondary forest management in Africa: Reality and perspectives. Workshop proceedings, Nairobi, Kenya, 9-13 December 2002. http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/J0628E/J0628E62.htm (July 4, 2016).
[3]
Government of the Kingdom of Swaziland, (2017). The 2017 Population and Household Census. Preliminary Results Central Statistical Office. Mbabane, Swaziland.
[4]
Remmelzwaal, A. (1993) Physiographic map of Swaziland. SWA /89 /001. Field Document No. 4. Mbabane, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) / United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) / Swaziland Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives (MoAC).
[5]
Government of Swaziland. (2005) Community-Based Natural Resources and Land Management: Support to New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD). Comprehensive Africa Development Programme (CAADP) Implementation. TCP/SWA/2910 (1). ftp.//ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/008/ae683/ae683e00.pdf [Accessed 27thNovember 2014].
[6]
Government of Swaziland. (1997) Swaziland Environment Action Plan (SEAP) http://www.environment.gov.sz/files/seap.pdf [Accessed 14th January 2017].
[7]
BelAfrique your personal travel planner (Undated). Africa Southern Africa Regions BelAfrique your personal travel planner - www.BelAfrique.com [Accessed 7thJanuary 2020].
[8]
Carter, J. (2010) ‘Introduction’. In L’viv, U. (ed.) How communities manage forests. pp. 6-9.
[9]
http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/How%20communities%20manage%20forests.pdf. [Accessed 26thOctober 2016].
[10]
Rath, B. (2010). Redefining community forestry: for a better approach & better world. file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/uniswa/My%20Documents/Downloads/redefining- community-forestry.pdf [Accessed 10th November 2015].
[11]
Government of Swaziland. (2002) National Forest Policy. Mbabane. Ministry of Agriculture and Co-operatives
[12]
Kafle, N. (Undated) Community forestry and rural livelihood (A case study of forest dependent community; Sundar Community Forestry Users Group, Makwanpur District of Nepal). Global Alliance of Community Forestry (GACF) GACF Secretariat Nepal. [Online] http://www.g3forest.org/userfiles/file/G3/CaseStudies/GACFCasestudies/Case-Study-ANGOC.pdf [Accessed 15th September 2016].
[13]
Sillah, J. S. (2003) ‘Gambia country paper’. In: Geldenhuys, C., Castañeda, F., Savenije, H. and Kuzee, M. (eds.) Tropical Secondary Forest Management in Africa: Reality and Perspectives. Workshop proceedings, Nairobi, Kenya, 9-13 December 2002. [Online] http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/J0628E/J0628E62.htm [Accessed 4th July 2016].
[14]
Sithole, G. (2013) ‘Access to and utilization of forest resources: Evidence from common property forest management in Swaziland’. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry, Volume 5, No. 7. pp. 92-108. http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1379589380_Sithole.pdf [Accessed 7th March 2014].
[15]
Singwane, S. S. (2006) ‘Gender issues in forest resource management in Swaziland: The case of Kukhanyeni constituency’. UNISWA Research Journal of Agriculture, Science and Technology, Volume 9, No. 1. pp. 57-67.
[16]
Government of Swaziland. (2001) State of environment report for Swaziland http://www.environment.gov.sz/files/soer.pdf [Accessed 14th January 2017].
[17]
Strydom, H. (2005b) ‘Sampling and sampling methods’. In: de Vos, A. S., Strydom, H. Fouché, C. B. and Delport, C. S. L. (eds.) Research at Grass roots for the Social Sciences and Human Service Professions (3rd edition). Van Schaik: Pretoria. pp. 192-204.
[18]
Marambanyika, T. and Beckedahl, B. (2017) ‘Institutional arrangements governing wetland utilization and conservation in communal areas of Zimbabwe’. Review of Social Sciences, Vol. 02, No. 01: pp. 1-17. http://www.socialsciencejournal.org/index.php/site/article/download/71/38 [Accessed 21st January 2017].
[19]
Mogotsi, I., Lendelvo, S., Angula, M. and Nakanyala J. (2016). ‘Forest resource management and utilisation through a gendered lens in Namibia’. Environment and Natural Resources Research. Vol. 6, No. 4. pp. 79-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/enrr.v6n4p79 [Accessed 7th July 2018].
[20]
World Food Programme (2016) Swaziland Current issues and what the World Food Programme is doing. https://www.wfp.org/countries/swaziland [Accessed 28th October 2016].
[21]
Dlamini, T. N. (2015) Exploring the impacts of land tenure system change on the sustainability of common resources in Swaziland. Masters’ Thesis, Stellenbosch University. http://scholar.sun.ac.za/handle/10019.1/97152 [Accessed 12th April 2018].
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved