Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Traditional Utilization of National Resources and Sustainable Livelihoods Support in Northwest Area of White Nile State
Current Issue
Volume 3, 2015
Issue 6 (December)
Pages: 249-254   |   Vol. 3, No. 6, December 2015   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 50   Since Dec. 9, 2015 Views: 1323   Since Dec. 9, 2015
Authors
[1]
Mohamednour Abdelrahim Gasmelseed, United Nations Office for Project Services, Khartoum, Sudan.
[2]
Elnour A. Elsiddig, Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.
[3]
Abdel Salam O. Sid Ahmed, Forest Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Bakht Arida, Ed-Dueim, Sudan.
Abstract
This study was conducted in the north-western part of the White Nile state; mainly focused to examine the interaction between human and the natural environment, to investigate the support provided by the different activities that make up the livelihood system of the rural population considering the factors affecting them. The study also meant to find out the livelihood strategies adopted by the households living in the area to mitigate and/or adapt to crisis. The primary data were obtained through the use of questionnaire from nine villages, each three representing a specific locality and each village representing a specific stratum. Secondary data was obtained from focus group discussions with village leaders and elder groups, available references, previous studies, researcher observations and available reports. Data were analyzed using simple descriptive statistics and analysis of households’ income and consumption expenditure to determine dominant source of income and the most prominent items been purchased. Results obtained show that over 80% of respondents surveyed are dependent on agriculture and/or animal production. However, the results indicated that the agricultural production is very low where the majority of households (44.4%) produce only one sack of cereals per feddan from traditional rain fed cultivation, and have the lowest income from farming and animal production. The study revealed that the majority of households surveyed did not produce enough food to fulfill their household's food demand, and that their consumption expenditure is very high (SDG 6774.2) of which 58.4% spent on food. These are mainly due to a combination of environmental, ecological, technical and institutional problems as indicated by 70.6% of the respondents. This situation makes the people vulnerable to food shortage. As the study area, northwest White Nile state represents the dry lands of the country, the natural ecosystems are subjected to degradation, and the declining trends of the natural resources are eroding the life support systems in this area. Therefore, rural people have lower access to natural forests and trees which provided them with diversity of uses and benefits. The study revealed that most of the valuable tree species have disappeared and even those still existing, are subjected to grazing and cutting. The net result is the continuous degradation of forests and trees and more increase in vulnerability. The study also shows that, vulnerable households adopted different adaptive strategies to mitigate/cope with risks, based on the options available for them.
Keywords
Traditional, Utilization, Natural Resources, Degradation, Livelihoods, Vulnerability, Support, Income, Consumption, Coping Strategies
Reference
[1]
Campbell, B. M. (1986). The importance of wild fruits for peasants households in Zimbabwe. Food and Nutrition. 12 (1): 38 – 80. Campbell, et al., 2002.
[2]
Campbell, D.J. 1994. Response to drought among farmers in southern Kajiado District, Human Ecology, 12(1). 35 – 63.
[3]
Chikamai, B.N and B. N. Kigomo (2003). Ecological Degradation and Global Change. The Case of Drylands. Kenya Forestry Research Institute. Nairobi, Kenya.
[4]
DFID (Department for International Development), 1999/2000. Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. London: DFID. The guidance sheets are available online at http://www.ids.ae.uk/livelihoods
[5]
ElKhidir, G. M. (2008). Socio-economic Aspects of Natural Vegetation Cover affecting Rural communities Sustainable Livelihoods. PhD thesis, University of BakhtArRida, 2008.
[6]
El Nadi, A. H. 2006. Paper on: Plan of Action for Research on Desertification in Sudan. The White Nile State. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Khartoum.
[7]
Elsiddig, E. A. 1986. Forest products yield determination in selected natural forests in eastern region. Fuel wood Development for Energy in Sudan. Field document No. 8.
[8]
ElSiddig, E. A. 2003. The Importance of Trees and Forests for Local Communities in Drylands of Sub Saharan Africa. Faculty of Forestry. University of Khartoum, 15p.
[9]
Elsiddig, E. A. (2007). Jebel Marra. The potentials for Resources and Rural Development. University of Khartoum. Faculty of Forestry, Shambat, 232p.
[10]
ElSiddig, E.A., Eltayeb, A.M., Abdelgadir, A.Y. 1998. Sustainable management of natural forests in Jebel Marra with consideration to community needs. Sudanese Environment Conservation Society, Khartoum. 68 pp.
[11]
Falconer, J.1990. The major significance of minor forest products: the local use and value of forests in West African humid forest zone. Community Forestry note number 6. Rome. FAO, 232 pp.
[12]
FAO (1994). Policies for Sustainable Development. FAO Economic and Development Paper, No. 121.
[13]
FAO (2001). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000. FAO Forest Paper, No. 140. FAO, Rome.
[14]
FNC (2002). Annual report 2001/2002. Forests National Corporation. Khartoum. 83. p.
[15]
FRA, 2005. Global Forests Resources Assessment. Estimating Forest Cover and Forest Cover Change in Sudan.
[16]
Gaiballa, A. K. et. al. (1997). Survey of Natural Resources in El-Baja area, with Special Emphasis on Levels of Utilization and Management indicators for System Sustainability.
[17]
Kaimowitz, D. 2003. Not by bread alone forests and rural livelihoods in sub Saharan Africa. In. T. Oksanen, B. Pajari and T. Tuomasjukka, 2003. forestry in poverty reduction strategies: capturing the potentials, EFI proceedings, No. 47, 65-83.
[18]
Kaudia, A.A., and E. Obonyo. 2003. Sociological Aspects of Land use Decisions: A Focus on Demography, Livelihoods and Poverty. Kenya Forestry Research Institute, Kenya.
[19]
Khatteli, H. 1998. Review of Major Research in arid and desert Tunisia. In: Sivakumar, M.V.K; Zobish, M.A; Koala, S. and Maukonen, T. (Eds). Wind Erosion in Africa and West Asia: Problems and control Strategies, ICADIA, Alepo, Syria, 198 p.
[20]
Khogali, M.M. (1986). The changing nature of nomadism in northern White Nile region. In: Rural Development in white Nile Province, Sudan. Study of the interaction between man and natural resources. The united Nations University, 147p.
[21]
Mogaka, H., Gacheke, S., Turipe, J., Emerton, L., and Karaja, F. 2001. Economic aspects of community involvement in sustainable forest management in eastern and southern Africa. IUCN-Eastern Africa Regional Office. Forest and Social Perspectives in Conservation. No. 8 Nairobi.
[22]
Monela, G.C., Kajembe, G.C., Kaoneka, A.R.S. and Kowero, G. 2000. Household livelihood strategies in the Miombo woodland of Tanzania. Tanzania Journal of Forestry and Nature Conservancy, 73: 17 – 33.
[23]
Mustafa, A. F. (1997). Regeneration of Acacia seyal forests on the clay land of the Sudan clay plain. PhD thesis. University of Helsinki. 103 p.
[24]
Mustafa, et al. (1999). Manual of Research Methodology. Khartoum, Sudan. 147p.
[25]
Nabangao, G.N., and Gombya-Sembajjwe, W.S. 2001. The effect of household endowment and entitlement of natural forests. International Forestry Review, 3(1): 34 – 41.
[26]
Scoones, I. 1998. Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: a framework for analysis. Brighton: Institute for Development Studies Working Paper 72. 22pp.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved