Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Comparative Study of Different Blood Pressure Measuring Instruments in Human
Current Issue
Volume 3, 2018
Issue 3 (May)
Pages: 21-29   |   Vol. 3, No. 3, May 2018   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 32   Since Aug. 2, 2018 Views: 1066   Since Aug. 2, 2018
Authors
[1]
Igbokwe Ugochukwu Vincent, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Anambra State, Nigeria.
[2]
Ejike Daniel Eze, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Ishaka, Bushenyi, Uganda.
[3]
Moses Dele Adams, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science and Technology, Bingham University, Karu, Nigeria.
[4]
Mazi Ikechukwu, Department of Physiology, Faculty of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Nnewi Campus, Anambra State, Nigeria.
[5]
Denen Atsukwei, Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nasarawa State, Nigeria.
[6]
Karimah Mohammed Rabiu, Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Yobe State University, Damaturu, Nigeria.
[7]
Adam Moyosore Afodun, Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Kampala International University, Western Campus, Ishaka, Bushenyi, Uganda.
Abstract
Hypertension is one of the major public health problems affecting the whole world and has been identified as the most common communicable disease in Nigeria. Accurate measurement of blood pressure is of utmost importance for early diagnosis and management. Concerns related to the potential ill effects of mercury on health and environment have led to the call for the removal of mercury sphygmomanometers from clinical investigations, and the widespread use of non-mercury sphygmomanometers. However, the accuracy of these non-mercury measures needs to be ascertained. This study was conducted to compare the accuracy of aneroid and digital sphygmomanometers with reference to a mercury sphygmomanometer. A total of 72 subjects (34 males and 38 females) were used for this study. All the subjects were between the ages of 20-25 years and weighed between 52kg-80kg. Three blood pressure (BP) readings were taken from each arm using each sphygmomanometer type, and the means of these readings were recorded. Paired t-test and independent t-test were used to analyze the data and values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The results showed that the males had significantly higher systolic and diastolic BPs than the females. The males also had higher inter-arm differences than the females, which was significant only with the mercury sphygmomanometer. Absolute systolic inter-arm difference ≥10mmHg and diastolic inter arm difference ≥ 5mmHg were considered the risk factors of future cardiovascular morbidities. Therefore, the inter-arm difference should be considered during blood pressure measurement for the correct management of hypertension. The results also showed significant differences between the mercury and Aneroid measures, and also between the mercury and digital measures. However, these variations were within the threshold set by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation guidelines, with the exception of the diastolic pressures measured by the digital instrument, which were lower than the mercury measures. This means that both non-mercury instruments can serve as independent instruments for accurate blood pressure measurement in clinical and research settings.
Keywords
Hypertension, Mercury Sphygmomanometer, Inter-arm Difference, Systolic Blood Pressure, Diastolic Blood Pressure, Digital Sphygmomanometer, Aneroid Sphygmomanometer
Reference
[1]
Mesquita, C. T. (2017). The Accuracy of Blood Pressure Measurement. International Journal of Cardiovascular Sciences. 2017; 30 (2): 98-99. DOI: 10.5935/2359-4802.20170041.
[2]
Schwartz, C. L., Clark, C., Koshiaris, C., Gill, P. S., Greenfield, S. M. (2017). Interarm Difference in Systolic Blood Pressure in Different Ethnic Groups and Relationship to the “White Coat Effect”: A Cross-Sectional Study. American Journal of Hypertension. 30 (9): 884-891. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx073.
[3]
Thomas, O., Shipman, K. E., Day, K., Thomas, M., Martin, U., Dasgupta, I. (2016). Prevalence and determinants of white coat effect in a large UK hypertension clinic population. J Hum Hypertens, 2016; 30: 386–391. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2015.95.
[4]
Kanakapriya, K. and Manivannan, M. (2012). Blood pressure measurement with sphygmomanometer in high fidelity mannequins; International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 2 (9): 533-537. https://doi.org/docplayer.net/25011746
[5]
Clark, C. E., Taylor, R. S., Shore, A., Campbell, J. (2016a). Prevalence of systolic inter-arm differences in blood pressure for different primary care populations: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract 2016; 66: e297–e308. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16X687553
[6]
Sreedharan, J., Mathew, E., Muttappallymyalil, J., Sharbatti, S. A., Shaikh, R. B. and Basha, S. A. (2010). Determinants of blood pressure among youth in Ajman, UAE. Nepal Journal of Epidemiology, 1 (1): 17-21. https://doi.org/10.4107/3469
[7]
Joshi, S., Christopher, C., Campbell, J. (2016). What is the normal inter-arm difference? It depends on left or right handedness: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2016; 34 (e-Suppl 2): e359. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpx073
[8]
Bolivar, J. J. (2013). Essential hypertension: an approach to its etiology and neurogenic pathophysiology. International Journal of Hypertension, 547809 [PMID: 24386559 https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/547809
[9]
Clark, C. E. (2017). The inter-arm blood pressure difference: Do we know enough yet? J Clin Hypertens. 2017; 19: 462–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12982
[10]
Weber, M. A., Schiffrin, E. L., White, W. B., Mann, S. and Lindholm, L. H. (2014). Clinical practice guidelines for the management of hypertension in the community: a statement by the American Society of Hypertension and the International Society of Hypertension. Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich), 16: 14-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12237
[11]
Beaglehole, R., Bonita, R., Alleyne, G., Horton, R., Li, L., Lincoln, P., Jean, C. M., Martin, M., Rob, M., Sania, N., Peter, P., Srinath, R. and David, S. (2011). UN high-level meeting on non-communicable diseases: addressing four questions, 378 (9789): 449-455. https://www.science.gov/topicpages/n/non-communicable+diseases+including
[12]
Weiss, A., Grossman, A., Beloosesky, Y., Koren-Morag, N., Green, H., Grossman, E. (2015). Inter- arm blood pressure difference in hospitalized elderly patients is not associated with excess mortality. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015; 17: 786–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12982
[13]
Verma, N., Raju, S., Kumar, P., Kumai, R., Bhardwaj, K. (2016). Inter arm systolic blood pressure difference is associated with a high prevalence of cardio vascular diseases. Int J Res Med Sci. 2016; 4: 1177–1180. DOI: 10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20160805
[14]
Zhou, M., Gao, Z., Chen, F., Xu, H., Dong, X., Ma, L. (2016). The inter- arm systolic blood pressure difference and risk of cardiovascular mortality: a meta- analysis of cohort studies. Clin Exp Hypertens. 2016; 38: 317–324. https://doi.org/10.3109/10641963.2015.1116542.
[15]
Shahbabu, B., Dasgupta, A., Sarkar, K. and Sahoo, S. K. (2016). Which is more accurate in measuring the blood pressure? A Digital or an Aneroid Sphygmomanometer. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 10 (3): 11-14. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/14351.7458
[16]
Wei, M., Baowei, Z., Ying, Y., Litong, Q., Lei, M., Yan, Z., Yong, H. (2017). Correlating the relationship between inter-arm systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk factors. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017; 19: 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12987
[17]
Tokitsu, T., Yamamoto, E., Hirata, Y. (2015). Relationship between inter-arm blood pressure differences and future cardiovascular events in coronary artery disease. J Hypertens. 2015; 33: 1780–1790. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000616
[18]
Singh, S., Sethi, A., Singh, M., Khosla, S. (2015). Prevalence of simultaneously measured inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference and its clinical and demographic predictors: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Blood Press Monit 2015; 20: 178–185. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0000000000000115.
[19]
Clark, C. E., Shore, A. C. (2016b). Inter- arm blood pressure difference and mortality: a cohort study in an asymptomatic primary care population at elevated cardiovascular risk. Br J Gen Pract. 2016; 66: e297–e308. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684949
[20]
Quiroga, B., Galan, I., Garcia de Vinuesa, S., Goicoechea, M., Verdalles, U. L. J. (2015). Interarm systolic blood pressure as a predictor of cardiovascular events in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015; 30: 801–806. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv059.
[21]
Thomas D, Clark C, Llewellyn D, Ferrucci L, Campbell J. (2016). Inter- arm blood pressure difference and cognitve decline. A 9- year prospective study of older adults. J Hypertens. 2016; 34 (e-Supplement 2): e224. doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000491978.86523.00
[22]
AAMI (Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation), (2008). Manual, Electronic, Or Automated Sphygmomanometer. Available from: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Manual,+electronic,+or+automated+sphygmomanometers#0\nhttp://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Manual,+Electronic,+Or+Automated+Sphygmomanometers#0
[23]
Singh, S., Sethi, A., Singh, M., Khosla, K., Grewal, N., Khosla, S. (2015). Simultaneously measured inter-arm and inter- leg systolic blood pressure differences and cardiovascular risk stratification: a systemic review and meta- analysis. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015; 9: 640–650. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2015.05.013
[24]
Joshi S, Clark C, Campbell J. (2016). What is the normal inter- arm difference? It depends on left or right handedness: systematic review and meta- analysis. J Hum Hypertens. 2016; 30: 651–652. DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000492393.86165.81
[25]
Mejzner, N., Clark, C., Smith, L., Campbell, J. (2016). Trends in the diagnosis and organisation of care for hypertension over nine years in primary care in South West England. J Hum Hypertens. 2016; 30: 633–656. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X690461
[26]
Nevzati, E., Shafighi, M., Bakhtian, K. D., Treiber, H., Fandino, J. and Fathi, A. R. (2015). Estrogen induces Nitric oxide production via Nitric oxide synthase activation in endothelial cells. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 120: 141-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04981-6ˍ24
[27]
Cao, K., Xu, J., Shangguan, Q. (2015). Association of an inter-arm systolic blood pressure difference with all- cause and cardiovascular mortality: an updated meta- analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cardiol. 2015; 189: 211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.079.
[28]
Sato, K., Sugiura, T., Ohte, N., and Doh, Y. (2018). Association of physical activity with a systolic blood pressure difference between arms in older people. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13147
[29]
Seethalakshmi, K. and Biju, B. (2015). Inter arm blood pressure difference: An indicator of cardiovascular risk. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 3 (12): 3782-3785. https://doi.org/10.8203/2320-6012.ijrms20151442
[30]
Soares-Miranda, L., Siscovick, D. S., Psaty, B. M., Longstreth, W. T., Mozaffarian, D. (2016). Physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in older adults: The cardiovascular health study. Circulation, 2016; 133: 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.018323
[31]
Bursztyn, M. (2013). Inter-Arm Blood Pressure Difference. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 15 (11): 774-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12216
[32]
Arash, A. N., Zaniar, G., Mehrdad, L., Afsaneh, M., Firuzeh, H., Firuzeh, A., Alireza, E., Kazem, M. and Manouchehr, N. (2014). Manual or Automated Sphygmomanometer? A historical cohort to quantify measurement bias in Blood pressure recording. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 16 (10): 716-721. https://doi.org/10.1111/jch.12400
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved