The Effect of Physical Co-Location on Social Competence, Gaming Engagement and Gamer Identity within a Competitive Multiplayer Game
Playing digital games in the physical co-location of others elicits a different experience than solo play, with the experience of social play often being described as more immersive and fun. The current study investigated in a sample of 40 individuals (mean age=20.3 years), the effect of playing a competitive multiplayer game on gaming engagement, gamer identity and social competence; and whether this effect was influenced by the physical location of another player. Results showed that across all participants there was an increase in gamer identity, gaming engagement and social competence. The physical location of another player had a significantly greater effect on social competence than playing alone (p= 0.02). However, this was not the case for gamer identity or engagement (p>0.05). A significant positive relationship was found between engagement with identity (p<0.001) but not social competence (p>0.05); an association which held across game condition (i.e. solo and co-located gameplay). The results suggest that location of another player during competitive gameplay improves individuals’ self-evaluation of social competence and gaming more generally has positive impacts for players’ perceptions of identity.
Gamer Identity, Gamer Engagement, Social Competence, Physical Co-located Gameplay
[1]
Domahidi, E., Breuer, J., Kowert, R., Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2018). A longitudinal analysis of gaming-and non-gaming-related friendships and social support among social online game players. Media Psychology, 21 (2), 288-307.
[2]
Kaye, L. K., Kowert, R., & Quinn, S. (2017). The role of social identity and online social capital on psychosocial outcomes in MMO players. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 215-223. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.030
[3]
Ekman, I., Chanel, G., Järvelä, S., Kivikangas, J. M., Salminen, M., & Ravaja, N. (2012). Social interaction in games: Measuring physiological linkage and social presence. Simulation & Gaming, 43 (3), 321-338.
[4]
Sherry, J., Lucas, K., Greenberg, B. S., & Lachlan, K. (2006). Video game uses and gratifications as predictors of use and game preference. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 213–224). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
[5]
Gajadhar, B. J., De Kort, Y. A., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2008). Influence of social setting on player experience in digital games. In Proceedings of CHI 2008 Conference, April 5-10, 2008, Florence: Italy
[6]
Kaye, L. K. & Bryce, J. (2014). Go with the flow: The experience and affective outcomes of solo versus social gameplay. Journal of Gaming and Virtual Worlds, 6 (1), 49-60. doi: 10.1386/jgvw.6.1.49_1
[7]
Kaye, L. K., Monk, R. L., Wall, H. J., Hamlin, I., & Qureshi, A. W. (2018). The effect of flow and context on in-vivo positive mood in digital gaming. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 110, 45-52.
[8]
Ducheneaut, N., Yee, N., Nickell, E., & Moore, R. J. (2006). Alone together?: exploring the social dynamics of massively multiplayer online games. In W. E. Mackay, S. Brewster, & S. Bødker (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 407-416). New York, USA: ACM.
[9]
de Kort, Y. A. W., Jsselsteijn, W. A., & Poels, K. (2007). Digital games as social presence technology: Development of the social presence in gaming questionnaire (SPGQ). In Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Workshop on Presence, October 25-27, 2007, Barcelona: Starlab 2007, 195-203
[10]
Markus, H. (1978). The effect of mere presence on social facilitation: An unobtrusive test. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14 (4), 389-397.
[11]
Paulus, P. B. (Ed.). (2015). Psychology of group influence (Vol. 22). Psychology Press.
[12]
Bowman, N. D., Weber, R., Tamborini, R., & Sherry, J. (2013). Facilitating game play: How others affect performance at and enjoyment of video games. Media Psychology, 16 (1), 39-64.
[13]
Eastin, M. S. (2007). The influence of competitive and cooperative group game play on state hostility. Human Communication Research, 33, 450–466.
[14]
Ratan, R. A., Chung, J. E., Shen, C., Williams, D., & Poole, M. S. (2010). Schmoozing and smiting: Trust, social institutions, and communication patterns in an MMOG. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 16, 93–114.
[15]
Cairns, P., Cox, A. L., Day, M., Martin, H., & Perryman, T. (2013). Who but not where: The effect of social play on immersion in digital games. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 71 (11), 1069-1077.
[16]
Gajadhar, B. J., De Kort, Y. A., & Ijsselsteijn, W. A. (2008). Shared fun is doubled fun: player enjoyment as a function of social setting. In Fun and games (pp. 106-117). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
[17]
Gajadhar, B. J., de Kort, Y. A. W., & IJsselsteijn, W. A. (2009). Rules of engagement: influence of co-player presence on player involvement in digital games. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations, 1 (3), 14-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jgcms.2009070102.
[18]
De Kort, Y. A. W., IJsselsteijn, W. A., & Gajadhar, B. J. (2007). People, Places, and Play: A research framework for digital game experience in a socio-spatial context. DiGRA 2007 Proceedings" Situated Play, 823-830.
[19]
Holmes, R. M., & Pellegrini, A. D. (2005). Children’s social behavior during video game play. In: J. Raessens & J. Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of Computer Game Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 133-144.
[20]
Calvert, (2005). Cognitive effects of video games. In: J. Raessens & J. Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of Computer Game Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 125- 131.
[21]
Gunter, B. (2005). Psychological effects of video games. In: J. Raessens & J. Goldstein (eds.), Handbook of Computer Game Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 145-160.
[22]
Brockmyer, J. H., Fox, C. M., Curtiss, K. A., McBroom, E., Burkhart, K. M., & Pidruzny, J. N. (2009). The development of the Game Engagement Questionnaire: A measure of engagement in video game-playing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45 (4), 624-634.
[23]
Cheng, M. T., Lin, Y. W., She, H. C., & Kuo, P. C. (2017). Is immersion of any value? Whether, and to what extent, game immersion experience during serious gaming affects science learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48 (2), 246-263.
[24]
Csíkszentmihályi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
[25]
Jin, W., Sun, Y., Wang, N., & Zhang, X. (2017). Why users purchase virtual products in MMORPG? An integrative perspective of social presence and user engagement. Internet Research, 27 (2), 408-427.
[26]
Black, D. (2017). Why can i see my avatar? embodied visual engagement in the third-person video game. Games and Culture, 12 (2), 179-199.
[27]
Wiebe, E. N., Lamb, A., Hardy, M., & Sharek, D. (2014). Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: Investigation of the User Engagement Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 123-132.
[28]
Soutter, A. R. B., & Hitchens, M. (2016). The relationship between character identification and flow state within video games. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1030-1038.
[29]
Tamborini, R., & Skalski, P. (2006). The role of presence in the experience of electronic games. Playing video games: Motives, responses, and consequences, 225-240.
[30]
Przybylski, A. K., & Mishkin, A. F. (2016). How the quantity and quality of electronic gaming relates to adolescents’ academic engagement and psychosocial adjustment. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5 (2), 145.
[31]
Lim, S., & Reeves, B. (2010). Computer agents versus avatars: responses to interactive game characters controlled by a computer or other player. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68 (1-2), 57-68.
[32]
Kowert, R., Vogelgesang, J., Festl, R., & Quandt, T. (2015). Psychosocial causes and consequences of online video game play. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 51 - 58. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.074
[33]
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In J. A. Williams, & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33-47) (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth).
[34]
Kaye, L. K. (2014). Football manager as a persuasive game for social identity formation. In D. Ruggiero (Ed.), Cases of societal effects of persuasive games (pp. 1-17). IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6206-3.ch001.
[35]
Kowert, R. (2015). Video games and social competence. New York: Routledge.
[36]
Fraser, J., Shane-Simpson, C., & Asbell-Clarke, J. (2014). Youth science identity, science learning, and gaming experiences. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 523-532.
[37]
Visser, M., Antheunis, M. L., & Schouten, A. P. (2013). Online communication and social well-being: How playing World of Warcraft affects players' social competence and loneliness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43 (7), 1508-1517.
[38]
Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of experimental social psychology, 31 (5), 410-436.
[39]
Riggio, R. E., & Canary, D. R. (2003). Social skills inventory manual (2nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: MindGarden.
[40]
Venkatesh, A., & Mukherjee, S. (2006). Video Games as Nurturing Technology: Relational and Bonding Issues. In: A. Elliott, S. D. Mainwaring, P. Sengers, & A. Woodruff (organizers): Nurturing Technologies in the Domestic Environment: Feeling Comforted, Cared for, and Connected at Home. UbiComp 2006 Workshop, September 18, 2006.
[41]
Kaye, L. K. (2016). Exploring flow experiences in cooperative digital gaming contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 286-291. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.023
[42]
Kaye, L. K., Monk, R. L., & Hamlin, I. (2018). “Feeling appy?”: Using app-based methodology to explore contextual effects on real-time cognitions, affect and behaviours. In C. Costa & J. Condie (Eds.), Doing research in and on the digital: Research methods across fields of inquiry. Taylor and Francis Ltd
[43]
Hogg, M. A. (2016). Social Identity Theory. In S. McKeown, R. Haji & N. Ferguson (Eds.), Understanding Peace and Conflict Through Social Identity Theory (pp 3-17). Switzerland: Springer
[44]
Jenson, J., Fisher, S., & de Castell, S. (2011). Disrupting the gender order: Leveling up and claiming space in an after-school video game club. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3 (1), 148-169.
[45]
Kaye, L. K., & Pennington, C. R. (2016). “Girls can’t play”: The Effects of Stereotype Threat on Females’ Gaming Performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 202-209. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.020
[46]
Ravaja, N., Saari, T., Turpeinen, M., Laarni, J., Slaminen, M., & Kivikangas, M. (2006). Spatial presence and emotions during video game playing: Does it matter with whom you play? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15, 381-392.
[47]
Waddell, J. C. & Peng, W. (2014). Does it matter with whom you slay? The effects of competition, cooperation and relationship type among video game players. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 331-338. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.017
[48]
Kowert, R., Griffiths, M. D., & Oldmeadow, J. A. (2012). Geek or Chic? Emerging Stereotypes of Online Gamers. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 32 (6), 471–479. http://doi.org/10.1177/0270467612469078
[49]
Kowert, R., & Oldmeadow, J. A. (2012). The Stereotype of Online Gamers: New Characterization or Recycled Prototype. In Proceedings of Nordic DiGRA: Games in Culture and Society Conference. Tampere, Finland: DiGRA.
