Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Using Webquest in Teaching Reading in the Junior High School
Current Issue
Volume 5, 2018
Issue 3 (May)
Pages: 26-30   |   Vol. 5, No. 3, May 2018   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 40   Since Aug. 31, 2018 Views: 938   Since Aug. 31, 2018
Janet Alesna Mananay, Department of Teacher Education, Cebu Normal University, Cebu City, Philippines.
This experimental study compared and evaluated the impact and effectiveness of Web Quest and Conventional Teaching Approaches as teaching strategies in teaching Reading Comprehension. Their comparison and evaluation were based on the students’ pre and posttests on a standardized reading comprehension test. The study utilized the quasi-experimental method of pretest posttest control group design with 72 subjects from Sacred Heart School- Ateneo de Cebu, Cebu City, Philippines. After the experimental period, it was found out that (1) The control group (exposed to Conventional Teaching Approach) and the experimental group (exposed to Web Quest Approach) had above average performance level both in the pretest and posttest. (2) The control and experimental groups obtained significant improvement from the pretest to the posttest in reading comprehension. (3) The control group had higher mean gain as compared to the experimental groups. (4) The experimental group manifested “Good” perception on the Web Quest as a teaching approach. In this study, the Conventional Teaching Approach (CTA) and the Web Quest Approach (WQA) were found to be effective since the students manifested improvement in their reading comprehension skills. However, the learning environment through guided instruction, where there is more teacher interaction and contact faired higher. Learning therefore is more precise because of direct contact with the teacher. Piles of books nor animated and updated technology cannot equal one good teacher.
Webquest, Reading Comprehension, Direct Teacher Contact
Dodge, B. (2009). Five Rules for Writing a Great Web Quest. Learning and Leading with Technology.
Dodge 3, B. (1998). Web Quest: A strategy for scaffolding higher level learning. Retrieved September 3, 2013, from http://webquest.sdsu.edu./necc98.htm
Engelmann, S. & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Eugene, OR: ADI Press.
Forshaw, L. (2002). Web Quests, what are they, an How do I make one? Paper presented in EDUC 370 language Arts in the Classroom at Saint Joseph College, West Hartfrord, CT.
Halat, E. (2008b). The Effects of Designing Web Quests on the Motivation of the Pre-Service Elementary School Teachers. International Journal of Education in Science and Technology, 39 (6), 793-802.
Khan, B. H. (2005). Learning features in an open, flexible, and distributed environment. AACE Journal, 13 (2), 137-153.
Lamb, A. (2002). Locating and Evaluating Web Quests. Retrieved September 19, 2013 from: http://eduscapes.com/tap/topic4.html.
Lindsay, J. (2002). December 12. Digital Teaching Portfolios. Presentation at the Professional Educators Association of Kuwait Conference. http://www.lindsayonline.net/Reaching_Out/Teacher-link/digport_pdf.pdf.
Lindsay, J. (2004). Fostering an online learning community for the development of student digital portfolios. Paper presented at the 19th International Baccalaureate Asia Pacific Regional Conference.
Lindsay, J. (2005) a. Digital teaching portfolio. Weblogs and student portfolio projects. Why and How to implement them? Presentation at the 2005 TESOL CALL Interest Section Electronic Village.
Maddux, C. D., & Cummings, R. (2007). Web Quests: Are they developmentally appropriate? The Educational Forum, 71, 117-127.
March, T. (1998). Why Web Quest/ An introduction. Retrieved September 20, 2013 from http://www.ozline.com/webquests/intro.html.
Merriam, S. and Caffarela, S. (1999). Linking the Individual Learner to the Context of Adult Learning. (article retrieved from http://www.google.com.ph/books?)
Neufeld, S. “In Pursuit of Alternatives in ELT Methodology: WebQuests” TOJET, 5 (7): 49-54. (2006).
Novak, J (2003). The Promise of New Ideas and New Technology for Improving Teaching and Learning. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, and Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, University of West Florida, Pensacola, Florida 32504.
Project Tomorrow (2011). Mapping a Personalized Learning Journey – K-12 Students and Parents Connect the Dots with Digital Learning (retrieved from http://www.tomorrow.org/speakup/pdfs/SU11_PersonalizedLearning_Students.pdf)
Reeves, T. & Wang, S. (2006) The effects of a web-based learning environment on student motivation in a high school earth science course. Association of Educational Communications and Technology. (retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e43f/7b944fedd5a92f4e1f0e7b2147871bed9899.pdf)
Rilling, Sarah (2005) Learning Languages through Technology (retrieved June 2014 from: http://www.tesol.org/trash/technology/learning-languages-through- technology.
Rosen, L. (2005) Teaching the iGeneration. Educational Leadership. February 2011 |Volume 68. Number 5. Teaching Screenagers. Page 10-15.
Smith, E. &Rilling, S. (2005). Learning Languages Through Technology. Maryland USA: United Graphics Incorporated.
Schneider, R. M &Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting reform based materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Education, 42 (3), 283-90.
Schoefield, JW. (1995). Computers and Classroom Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved