Concept and Methodological Challenges in the Social Approach that is Specific to the Teaching Process
[1]
Horaţiu Catalano , Department of Educational Sciences, Babes Bolyai University, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
There are two important paradigms provided teaching and learning process: the theory of instruction space and that of the pedagogical field. The situational instruction shall create and ensure the frame for situational learning that is focused on the ideas to achieve knowledge and skills in real and immediate contexts. The theory of educational space says that the educational action is optimized by a permanent control of all variables existing in the instruction field. These two paradigms have got advantages and limits, but we can affirm that it’s necessary a holistic point of view entirety of the implied factors.
Social-Ecological Approach, Teaching Process, Situational Paradigm, Spacial Paradigm, Learning Process
[1]
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Towards an Experimental Ecology of Human Development, American Psychologist, p. 513 – 531.
[2]
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
[3]
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Friedman SL and Wachs TD, ed. Measuring Environment across the Life Span: Emerging Methods and Concepts. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
[4]
Bernat, S. E. (2003). The Technique of Efficient Learning, Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj.
[5]
Catalano, H. (2013). The Teaching Process as an Instruction Field. The theory of the pedagogical field, in the volume Dimensions of Education and Formation in the Contemporary School, Editura Eikon, Editor: Vasile Chiş, Ion Albulescu, Horaţiu Catalano, P. 15-19.
[6]
Cerghit, I. (2002). Alternative and Complementary Instruction Systems, Editura Aramis, Bucuresti.
[7]
Cerghit, I., Neacşu, I., Negreţ, I., Pânişoară, I. O. (2001), Pedagogical Lectures, Editura Polirom, Iaşi.
[8]
Chiş, V. (2001). The Activity of a Teacher Between the Curriculum and Evaluation, Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca.
[9]
Cristea, S. (1998). Dictionary of Pedagogical Terms, Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucureşti.
[10]
Divoky, J., Rothermel, M.A. (1988). Student perception of the Relative Importance of Dimensions of Teaching Performance across Type of Class, „Educational Research Quarterly”, 12, 3, p. 40 – 45.
[11]
Ionescu, M. (2000). Creative Endeavors in Teaching and Learning, Editura Presa Universitară Clujeană, Cluj-Napoca.
[12]
Ionescu, M., Radu, I. (1995), Modern Didactics, Editura Dacia, Cluj-Napoca.
[13]
Iucu, B. R. (2000). Management of the School Class, Editura Polirom, Iaşi.
[14]
Leichter, H.J. (1978). Family and Communities as Educators: Some Concepts of Relationship, în Teachers College Record, 79 (4), pp. 567-658.
[15]
Lerbet, G. (1995). Le flon et l'ecolier. La culture du paradoxe, Editions Universitaires, Paris.
[16]
Păun, E., Potolea, D. (coord.),(2002). Pedagogics – Theoretic Foundations and Application, Editura Polirom, Iaşi.
[17]
Stănciulescu, E. (1997). Sociology of Family Education, vol. I, Editura Polirom, Iaşi.
[18]
Ştefan, M. (2006). Pedagogic Lexicon Editura Aramis, Bucureşti.
[19]
Ştefan, M. (2007). The theory of educative situations, Editura Aramis, Bucureşti.
[20]
Todoran, D. (1982). Fundamental Problems of Pedagogics, Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucureşti.
[21]
Vlăsceanu, L. (1979). Decision and innovation in school, Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucureşti.
[22]
***(1988). Lecture on Pedagogics, Tipografia Universităţii Bucureşti.
[23]
*** (1979). Dictionary of Pedagogics, Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucureşti.
