Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Pragmatic Failure: A Relevance Theory Perspective
Current Issue
Volume 5, 2017
Issue 2 (April)
Pages: 8-12   |   Vol. 5, No. 2, April 2017   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 51   Since Jul. 24, 2017 Views: 1292   Since Jul. 24, 2017
Authors
[1]
Du-xin Tsao, School of Foreign Languages, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
Relevance theory is an important theory in the field of cognitive-pramatics. Profound in content, it involves important concepts including cognitive context, optimal relevance and maximal relevance, inferential-ostensive process. Pragmatic failure, an inevitable phenomenon in the interlanguage, arises from the lack of ostentive behavior and the mal-evaluating of the addressee’s cognitive environment on the speakers’ part, and the failure to recognize speakers’ intension and establish assumptive cognitive context on the hearers’ side. This paper will probe into the pragmatic failure under Relevance Theory (RT), and tentatively explore the solutions of avoiding such failures in cross-cultural communication.
Keywords
Relevance Theory, Cognitive Context, Pragmatic Failure
Reference
[1]
Antia, Baasey Edem. 2000. Terminology and Language Planning: An Alternative Framework of Practice and Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjanmins Publishing Company.
[2]
Cabre, M. Teresa. 1999. Terminology: Theory, Method, and Applications. Amsterdam: John Benjanmins Publishing Company.
[3]
Carston, R. 2009. The Explicit/Implicit Distinction in Pragmatics and the Limits of Explicit Communication. International Review of Pragmatics 1: 35-62.
[4]
Carston, R. 2010. Explicit Communication and Free Pragmatic Enrichment. In B. Soria and E. Romero (eds.). Explicit Communication: Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 217–87.
[5]
Gutt, Ernst-August Gutt. 1991. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
[6]
Huang, Y. 2014. Pragmatics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[7]
Isard, S. 1975. Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Qian, G. L. 2001. Pragmatics: China's Position in Where? Foreign Language Research 4: 7-16.
[9]
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
[10]
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber. 2002. Truthfulness and Relevance. Mind 111: 583-632.
[11]
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber. 2004. Relevance Theory. In L, Horn and G, Ward (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. 607-632.
[12]
Xiong, X. L. 2000. Relevance in Cognition, Communication and Logic. Modern Foreign Languages1: 13-23.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved