Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Historicising Habermas’ Public Sphere: Conceptual Distinction between the Public Spheres of Habermas and Turkey
Current Issue
Volume 2, 2014
Issue 6 (December)
Pages: 152-165   |   Vol. 2, No. 6, December 2014   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 44   Since Aug. 28, 2015 Views: 2471   Since Aug. 28, 2015
Authors
[1]
Eduard Alan Bulut, Political Science and International Relations Department, Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
This study argues that it is necessary to historicise Habermas’ concept of “public sphere” and not to apply it to the present day in the form defined by Habermas, at least to all countries. Rather, a clear line should be drawn between the contextually-varying concept of public sphere in Habermas’ works and the recent understanding of public sphere in countries with assertive secularism in order to understand what is actually meant by this particular concept. There is a world of difference between the key terms of discussions on-going in Turkey and in Habermasian politico-philosophical works with regard to public sphere. In Turkey, the State has transformed the meaning of public sphere, has monopolised the sphere of the public and has developed oversensitivity to it; therefore, the term has undergone a loss of meaning. The public sphere, meaning of which has been shaped by Turkish founding fathers’ unitary ideology and secured by their subsequent heirs as a result of their status quo concerns, has gone far from the public sphere defined by Habermas.
Keywords
Habermas, Turkey, Public Sphere, Assertive Secularism, Private Sphere
Reference
[1]
Audi, Robert and Nicholas Wolterstoff. 1997. Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[2]
Baumeister, Andrea. 2011. “The Role of Religion in the Public Sphere: The Use of Public Reason by Religious and Secular Citizens.” Accessed December 3, 2011. ECPR: http://www.ecprnet.eu/conferences/general_conference/Reykjavik/paper_details.asp?paperid=3828.
[3]
Beers, David. 2006. “The Public Sphere and Online, Independent Journalism.” Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l'éducation 29(1): 109-130.
[4]
Bell, David A. 1992. “The "Public Sphere," the State, and the World of Law in Eighteenth-Century France.” French Historical Studies 17(4): 912-934.
[5]
Bloch, Ruth H. 2005. “Inside and outside the Public Sphere,” The William and Mary Quarterly 62(1): 99-106.
[6]
Bohman, James, and William Rehg. 2011. "Jurgen Habermas." The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta. Accessed December 17, 2011. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2011/entries/habermas/.
[7]
Bulut, Eduard A. 2009. “Turkiye’de Internet Yasaklari” Bilgi Dunyasi 11(2): 163-185.
[8]
Caha, Omer. 2005. “The Ideological Transformation of the Public Sphere: The Case of Turkey.” Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Development, 1&2(4): 1-30.
[9]
Calhoun, Craig. 1992. “Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere” in Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun. MIT Press.
[10]
Cetinkaya, Y. Dogan. 2008. “1908 Devrimi’nde Kamusal Alan ve Kitle Siyasetinde Donusum,” I.U. Siyasal Bilgiler Fakultesi Dergisi 38: 125-140.
[11]
Chelini-Pont, Blandine. 2005. “Religion in the Public Sphere: Challenges and Opportunities” Brigham Young University Law Review. 611-628.
[12]
Clark, Henry C. 1998. “Commerce, the Virtues, and the Public Sphere in Early-Seventeenth-Century France,” French Historical Studies 21(3): 415-440.
[13]
Cowan, Brian. 2004. “Mr. Spectator and the Coffeehouse Public Sphere,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 37(3): 345-366.
[14]
Cubitt, Sean. 2005. “Edge of Darkness: eco-terrorism and the public sphere,” in EcoMedia, Rodopi, pp. 79-98.
[15]
Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2005. “The Habermasian Public Sphere: Taking Difference Seriously?” Theory and Society 34(2): 111-136.
[16]
Dahlgren, Peter. 2005. “The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation.” Political Communication 22(2): 147-162.
[17]
d'Arcais, Paolo Flores. “Eleven Theses against Habermas” The Utopian. Accessed December, 4, 2011. http://www.the-utopian.org/d'Arcais_1
[18]
Ferree, Myra Marx et al. 2002. “Four Models of the Public Sphere in Modern Democracies” Theory and Society 31(3): 289-324.
[19]
Finlayson, James Gordon. 2005. Habermas: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
[20]
Fraser, Nancy. 1989. Unruly Practices: Power, Discourse, and Gender in Contemporary Social Theory. University of Minnesota Press.
[21]
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy,” Social Text 25/26: 56-80.
[22]
Goodman, Dena. 1992. “Public Sphere and Private Life: Toward a Synthesis of Current Historiographical Approaches to the Old Regime.” History and Theory 31(1): 1-20.
[23]
Green, Abigail. 2001. “Intervening in the Public Sphere: German Governments and the Press, 1815-1870.” The Historical Journal 44(1): 155-175.
[24]
Habermas, Jurgen. 1974. “The Public Sphere: An Encyclopaedia Article (1964),” trans. by Sara Lennox and Frank Lennox. New German Critique 3: 49-55.
[25]
Habermas, Jurgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, trans. by Thomas Burger and Frederick Lawrence: The MIT Press.
[26]
Habermas, Jurgen. 1998. Between Facts and Norms. MIT Press.
[27]
Habermas, Jurgen. 2006. “Religion in the Public Sphere.” European Journal of Philosophy 14(1): 1-25.
[28]
Hohendahl, Peter and Patricia Russian. 1974. “Jurgen Habermas: "The Public Sphere" (1964).” New German Critique 3: 45-48.
[29]
Holub, Robert C. 1991. Jurgen Habermas: critic in the public sphere. Routledge.
[30]
Howell, P. 1993. “Public Space and the Public Sphere: Political Theory and the Historical Geography of Modernity.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 11(3): 303-322.
[31]
Jacob, Margaret C. 1994. “The Mental Landscape of the Public Sphere: A European Perspective.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 28(1): 95-113.
[32]
Jessop, Bob. 1993. “Review of Habermas and the Public Sphere by Craig Calhoun.” Contemporary Sociology 22(4): 614-616.
[33]
Johnson, Pauline. 2006. Habermas: rescuing the public sphere. Routledge.
[34]
Kalayci, Nazile. 2007. “’Kamusal Alan’ Kavrami Uzerine Bir Inceleme: Aristoteles-Marx-Habermas” PhD diss. Hacettepe Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu, Felsefe Anabilim Dali.
[35]
Kale, Steven D. 2002. “Women, the Public Sphere, and the Persistence of Salons.” French Historical Studies 25(1): 115-148.
[36]
Kelly, Kristin. 2002. “Private family, private individual: John Locke's distinction between paternal and political power.” Social Theory and Practice 28(3): 361-380.
[37]
Kirli, Cengiz. 2009. Sultan ve Kamuoyu: Osmanli Modernlesme Surecinde "Havadis Jurnalleri" 1840-1844. Is Bankasi Yayinlari.
[38]
Kogacioglu, Dicle. 2004. “Progress, Unity, and Democracy: Dissolving Political Parties in Turkey.” Law & Society Review 38(3): 433-461.
[39]
Ku, Agnes S. 1998. “Boundary Politics in the Public Sphere: Openness, Secrecy, and Leak,” Sociological Theory 16(2): 172-192.
[40]
Kucukcan, Talip. 2007. “Kamusal Alan ve Din,” Kopru 99: 33-48.
[41]
Kumar, Krishan, and Ekaterina Makarova. 2008. “The Portable Home: The Domestication of Public Space.” Sociological Theory 26(4): 324-34.
[42]
Kuru, Ahmet T. 2007. “Passive and Assertive Secularism: Historical Conditions, Ideological Struggles, and State Policies toward Religion.” World Politics 59: 568–94.
[43]
Lynn, Michael R. 1999. “Enlightenment in the Public Sphere: The Musée de Monsieur and Scientific Culture in Late-Eighteenth-Century Paris,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 32(4): 463-476.
[44]
Mardin, Serif. 1962. The Genesis of Young Ottoman Thought: A Study in the Modernization of Turkish Political Ideas. Syracuse University Press.
[45]
Mardin, Serif. 1990. Turkiye’de Toplum ve Siyaset: Makaleler I, edited by Mumtaz’er Turkone and Tuncay Onder. Iletisim Yayinlari.
[46]
McCarthy, Thomas. 1994. "Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue." Ethics 105: 44-63.
[47]
Meyer, William J. 1995. “Private Faith or Public Religion? An Assessment of Habermas's Changing View of Religion.” The Journal of Religion 75(3): 371-391.
[48]
Mitchell, Don. 2007. “The End of Public Space? People's Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy” in Human Geography, edited by William G. Moseley et al. Blackwell Publisihing Ltd: 437-448.
[49]
Murphy, Thomas. 2005. "Public Sphere" New Dictionary of the History of Ideas, Encyclopedia.com. Accessed January 13, 2012. http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G2-3424300646.html
[50]
Nathans, Benjamin. 1990. “Habermas's "Public Sphere" in the Era of the French Revolution.” French Historical Studies 16(3): 620-644.
[51]
Negt, Oskar et al. 1988. “‘The Public Sphere and Experience’: Selections.” Accessed December 24, 2011. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/778678.pdf
[52]
Nowak, Urszula. 2010. “‘Wall of Separation’? Religion’s Presence in the Public Sphere of a Democratic State – Some Theoretical Reflections.” In Religion and Identities in Transition, edited by Irena Borowik and Malgorzata Zawila, 119-130.
[53]
Outhwaite, William. 1994. Habermas: a critical introduction. Stanford University Press.
[54]
Ozbank, Murat. 2009. Rawls-Habermas Tartismasi: Neden Demokrasi? Neden Istikrar? Istanbul Bilgi Universitesi Yayinlari.
[55]
Ozturk, Serdar. 2005. “Osmanli Imparatorlugu’nda Kamusal Alanin Dinamikleri,” Iletisim 21: 95-124.
[56]
Rajagopal, Arvind. 2006. “An American theory of the public sphere.” Review of The creation of the media: political origins of modern communications by Paul Starr. Sociological Forum 21(1): 147-157.
[57]
Rawls, John. 1997. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” The University of Chicago Law Review 64(3): 765-807.
[58]
Reddy, William M. 1992. “Postmodernism and the Public Sphere: Implications for an Historical Ethnography.” Cultural Anthropology 7(2): 135-168.
[59]
Saribay, Ali Yasar. 1995. Postmodernite, sivil toplum ve Islam. Iletisim Yayinlari.
[60]
Shaw, Brian J. 1999. “Habermas and Religious Inclusion: Lessons from Kant's Moral Theology.” Political Theory 27(5): 634-666.
[61]
Soules, Marshal. 2001. “Jurgen Habermas and the Public Sphere,” Accessed December 24, 2011. http://www.mala.bc.ca/~soules/media301/habermas.htm
[62]
Stout, Jeffrey. 2004. Democracy and Tradition. Princeton University Press.
[63]
Triadafilopoulos, Triadafilos. 1999. “Politics, Speech, and the Art of Persuasion: Toward an Aristotelian Conception of the Public Sphere,” The Journal of Politics 61(3): 741-757.
[64]
van der Veer, Peter. 2002. “Religion in South Asia.” Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 173-187.
[65]
Woods, Dwayne. 1992. “Civil Society in Europe and Africa: Limiting State Power through a Public Sphere.” African Studies Review 35(2): 77-100.
[66]
Yates, Melissa. 2007. “Rawls and Habermas on religion in the public sphere.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 33(7): 880-891.
[67]
Zurcher, Erik Jan. 1993. Turkey: A Modern History. I. B. Tauris.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved