Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Hemispheric Processing of Inferences During Discourse Reading: A Review of the Literature
Current Issue
Volume 5, 2018
Issue 3 (September)
Pages: 72-79   |   Vol. 5, No. 3, September 2018   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 34   Since Aug. 31, 2018 Views: 1074   Since Aug. 31, 2018
Authors
[1]
Weijuan Wang, National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China.
[2]
Lin Fan, National Research Centre for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China.
[3]
Fei Xu, Research Institute of Foreign Languages, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
Recently, there has been a surge of interest in exploring the inferential processes during reading with neurotechniques in psycholinguistics, psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience. Thus, neural mechanisms of inferential processes during discourse comprehension have been gradually revealed through the use of event-related potentials (ERPs), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), eye-tracking measurement, and positron emission tomography (PET). This paper aims to assess the status quo and prospects of research on neural mechanisms underlying inference generation during text comprehension. To this end, prominent models of inferential processes during reading comprehension are displayed and extant studies of neural mechanisms underlying different types of inferences (i.e., causal inferences, bridging inferences and predictive inferences) during text-level comprehension are elaborated. The most salient conclusion that can be drawn from this review is that even though there are quite a few studies performed on the neural mechanisms underlying different types of inferences, much needs to be done to reveal the underlying mechanisms of this complex cognitive process. It is promising to explore the validation phase of inferential processes during different genres of text comprehension in ideographic languages involving a wider range of subjects, and to examine the interactions between reader factors and text factors using neurotechniques in particular.
Keywords
Neural Mechanisms, Inferential Processes, Discourse Comprehension
Reference
[1]
Schank, R. C., The Role of Memory in Language Processing. In The structure of human memory C. N. Cofer (ed.):, Editor., 1976., p. 162-89., Freeman: San Francisco.
[2]
Van den Broek, P. W., Comprehension and Memory of Narrative Texts: Inference and Coherence., in Handbook of psycholinguistics., M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.):, Editor. 1994., p. 539-588., New York: Academic Press.
[3]
Rickheit, G., W. Schnotz, and H. Strohner, The Concept of Inference in Discourse Comprehension., In, Inferences in text processing., G. Rickheit, G. Schnotz & H. Strohner (eds.):, Editor., 1985., p. 3-49., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
[4]
Graesser, A. C., M. Singer, and T. Trabasso, Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 1994. 3: 371-95.
[5]
McKoon, G., and R. Ratcliff, Inference during reading. Psychological Review, 1992. 99 (3): p. 440-66.
[6]
Fletcher, C. R., and & C. P. Bloom, Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts. Journal of Memory and Language, 1988. 27: p. 235-44.
[7]
Bartlett, F. C., Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. 1932, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Berlyne, D. E., ‘Interest’ as a psychological concept. British Journal of Psychology, 1949. 39: p. 184-195.
[9]
Berlyne, D. E., Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. 1960, New York: McGraw-Hill.
[10]
Spiro, R. J., Constructive Processes in Prose Recall. In Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, and W. F. Brewer (eds.):, Editor., 1980., Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
[11]
Stein, N. L., and T. Trabasso, The Search After Meaning: Comprehension and Comprehension Monitoring. In Applied developmental psychology., F. J. Morrison, C. Lord, & D. Keating (eds.):, Editor., 1985., Vol. 2: p. 33-58., San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[12]
Liu, Z. Q., and Y. Q. Liu, A review of studies of language comprehension abroad. Journal of Sichuan International Studies University, 1998. 11: p. 45-52.
[13]
Fan, L., and Z. Q. Liu, A review of inferential models of discourse comprehension. Journal of PLA Foreign Language University, 2005. 5: p. 43-48.
[14]
Singer, M. Discourse Inference Processes., In Handbook of psycholinguistics., M. A. Gernsbacher (ed.):, Editor. 1994., p. 479–516., San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

[15]
Mason, R. A., and M. A. Just, How the brain processes causal inferences in text. Psychological Science, 2004. 15 (1): p. 1-7.
[16]
Kuperberg, G. R., et al., Making sense of discourse: An fMRI study of causal inferencing across sentences. NeoroImage, 2006. 33: p. 343-61.
[17]
Virtue, S., et al., Neural activity of inferences during story comprehension. Brain Research, 2006. p. 104-14.
[18]
Hald, L. A., E. G. Steeenkeek-Planting, and P. Hagoort, The interaction of discourse context and world knowledge in online sentence comprehension. Evidence from the N400. Brain Research, 2007. 1146: p. 210-18.
[19]
Van den Broek, P. W., K. Becker, and M. Oudega, Inference Generation in Text Comprehension: Automatic and Strategic Processes in the Construction of a Mental Representation., in Inferences during reading., In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cook, and R. F. Lorch (eds.):, Editor. 2015., p. 94-121., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[20]
Kuperberg, G. R., M. Paczynski, and T. Ditman, Establishing casual coherence across sentences: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2011. 5: p. 1230-46.
[21]
Xu, G., et al., An ERP study on how subsequent sentence context can influence previous world knowledge constraints. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 2015. 33: p. 96-103.
[22]
Foucart, A., et al., Discourse comprehension in L2: Making sense of what is not explicitly said. Brain & Language, 2016. 163: p. 32-41.
[23]
Kintsch, W., The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. Psychological View, 1988. 85: p. 363-94.
[24]
Prat, C. S., R. A. Mason, and M. Just, Individual differences in the neural basis of causal inferencing. Brain & Language, 2011. 116: p. 1-13.
[25]
Virtue S., P. W. Van den Broek, and T. Linderholm, Hemispheric processing of inferences: The effects of textual constraint and working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 2006. 34 (6): p. 1341-54.
[26]
Wang Y. H., et al., Brain activations of the inference processing in familiar topics expository text comprehension. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012. 11: p. 1443-53.
[27]
Singer, M., A. C. Graesser, and T. Trabasso, Minimal or global inference during reading. Journal of Memory & Language, 1994. 33 (4): p. 421-41.
[28]
Beeman, M., et al., Summation priming and coarse semantic coding in the right hemisphere. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1994. 6 (1): p. 26-45.
[29]
Kim and Kang, Neural correlates of bridging inferences and coherence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2011. 41: p. 311-21.
[30]
Baretta, L., et al., Inference making while reading narrative and expository texts: An ERP study. Psychology & Neuroscience, 2009. 2 (2): p. 137-145.
[31]
Sansosti, F. J., Eye movements during processing of text requiring bridging inferences in adolescents with higher functioning autism spectrum disorders: A preliminary investigation. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2013. 7: p. 1535-42.
[32]
Calvo, M. G., Relative contribution of vocabulary knowledge and working memory span to elaborative inferences in reading. Learning & Individual Differences, 2004. 15 (1): p. 53-65.
[33]
Beeman, M., E. M. Bowden, and M. A. Gernsbacher, Right and left hemisphere cooperation for drawing predictive and coherence inferences during normal story comprehension. Brain & Language, 2000. 71, p. 310–36.
[34]
Jin, H, et al., Involvement of the left inferior frontal gyrus in predictive inference making. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2009. 71: p. 142-48.
[35]
Beeman, M., Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2005. 9: p. 512–8.
[36]
Thompson-Schill, S. L., M. Esposito, and I. P. Kan, Effects of repetition and competition on activity in left prefrontal cortex during word generation. Neuron, 1999. 23: p. 513–22.
[37]
Chow, et al., Evidence of fronto-temporal interactions for strategic inference processes during language comprehension. NeuroImage, 2008. 40: p. 940-54.
[38]
Virtue, S., and L. M. Joss, Hemispheric processing of predictive inferences: the influence of reading goals and textual constraints. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2017. 1: p. 1-9.
[39]
Calvo, M. G., and M. D. Castil, Bias in predictive inferences during reading. Discourse Processes, 2010. 32 (1): p. 43-71.
[40]
Calvo, M. G., A. Estevez, and M. G. Dowens, Time course of elaborative inferences in reading as a function of prior vocabulary knowledge. Learning & Instruction, 2003. 13 (6): p. 611-31.
[41]
Hawelka, S., et al., On forward inferences of fast and slow readers: An eye movement study. Scientific Reports, 2015. 5: p. 1-8.
[42]
Calvo, M. G., E. Meseguer, and M. Carreiras, Inferences about predictable events: eye movements during reading. Psychological Research, 2001. 65 (3): p. 158-69.
[43]
Wlotko, E. W., and K. D. Federmeier, Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading. Cortex, 2015. 68, p. 20-32.
[44]
Pérez, A., et al., Evaluation and revision of inferential comprehension in narrative texts: An eye movement study. Language Cognition & Neuroscience, 2015. (4): p. 549-66.
[45]
Pérez, A., et al., Inferential revision in narrative texts: An ERP study. Memory & Cognition, 2015. 43: p. 1105–1135.
[46]
Bruner, J., Actual minds, possible worlds. 1986, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[47]
Nelson, K., Event knowledge: structure, and function in development. 1986, Hillsdale, NL: Prentice Hall.
[48]
Butler. A. C., N. A. Dennis, and E. J. Marsh, Inferring facts from fiction: Reading correct and incorrect information affects memory for related information. Memory, 2012. 20 (5): p. 487-97.
[49]
Cook, A. E., and E. J. O’Brien, Knowledge activation, integration, and validation during narrative text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 2014. 51: p. 26-49.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved