Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News Unsubscribe Page
Usefulness of EndNote Software for Writing Scientific Manuscripts: A Comparative Study
Current Issue
Volume 7, 2019
Issue 1 (March)
Pages: 6-10   |   Vol. 7, No. 1, March 2019   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 21   Since Feb. 13, 2019 Views: 328   Since Feb. 13, 2019
Authors
[1]
Saadeldin Ahmed Idris, Faculty of Medicine, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum, Sudan.
[2]
Abdul Ghani Qureshi, Almikhwah General Hospital, AL-Baha, KSA.
[3]
Ibrahim Salih Elkhair, Faculty of Medicine, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum, Sudan.
[4]
Tomadir Ahmed Idris, Faculty of Education, Taibah University, Al-Ula, KSA.
[5]
Ahmed Mohammed Adam, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Omdurman Islamic University, Khartoum, Sudan.
[6]
Nadir Khogali Mohammed, Faculty of Medicine, Alzaiem Alazhari University, Khartoum, Sudan.
Abstract
Referring from the text to the sources used and creating a bibliographic description (a reference) of each source used in an accurate and consistent way, are a fundamental part of scientific publications. This study was conducted to compare writing references and citation for scientific manuscript manually and by using EndNote software. Using a common referencing style formats (Vancouver and Harvard) we compared the time lapse and consumed that required for insertion of 20 references in a predesigned manuscript manually versus using EndNote software. In addition, the format of references was changed in different manners to find out the time required for making these changes. Time required for changing the order of citation, deletion and adding of one reference manually and by using EndNote software was calculated. The obtained data were managed statistically. Time spent for inserting one reference or all references in both formats Vancouver and Harvard manually and using EndNote software showed significant difference (P<0.05). Accurate reference style when using manual referencing Harvard versus Vancouver, it was 65% and 55% respectively, whereas it was 100% in both styles when using EndNote software (p<0.05). In conclusion; Citation using Endnote referencing software for writing manuscript significantly reduces time and improves the quality of the manuscript.
Keywords
Academic Manuscripts, References, Citations, Manual Citation, EndNote Software, Plagiarism
Reference
[1]
Derntl M. ‘Basics of research paper writing and publishing’, Int. J. Technology Enhanced Learning, 2014; 6 (2):105–123.
[2]
Welch H. G. Preparing Manuscripts for Submission to Medical Journals: The Paper Trail. Effective Clinical Practice. 1999; 2:131–137.
[3]
Kosaryan M, Rabiei Kh. The critical appraisal of the papers published in the "Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences", 2007-2010. Iran J Psychiatry Behave Sci 2013; 7 (2): 77-82.
[4]
Bravo E., Calzolari A., De Castro P., Mabile L., Napolitani F., Rossi A. M., Cambon-Thomsen A. Developing A Guideline to Standardize the Citation Of Bioresources in Journal Articles (Cobra). BMC Medicine 2015; 13:33.
[5]
Mabile L, Dalgleish R, Thorisson GA, Deschenes M, Hewitt R, Carpenter J, et al. Quantifying the use of bioresources for promoting their sharing in scientific research. Gigascience 2013; 2 (1):7.
[6]
Masic I. The Importance of Proper Citation of References in Biomedical Articles. Acta Inform Med. 2013 Sep; 21 (3): 148-155.
[7]
Catalini C, Lacetera N., Oettl A. 2015. The incidence and role of negative citations in science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2015; 112 (45):13823-6.
[8]
Ullah M., Butt I. F., Mubarik A. The accuracy of references in manuscripts selected for publication in Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal (PAFMJ). Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2008; 58 (3):299-303.
[9]
Azlan NMNI. Citation Typologies and Rhetorical Functions of Citations in Master Dissertations. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT) 2013; 1 (2): 61-74.
[10]
Jawaid SA, Jawaid M, Jafary MH. Deficiencies in original articles accepted for publication in Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences: A retrospective analysis. Pak J Med Sci 2009; 25 (1):1-6.
[11]
Kumar MJ. Even Brilliant Ideas are Never New: The Need to Cite References in a Research Paper. IETE Technical Review 2014; 31 (6): 403-404.
[12]
Peat J., Elliot E., Baur L., et al. Scientific Writing: Easy When You Know How. London, England: BMJ Books; 2005.
[13]
Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Gerasimov AN, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD. Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication. J Korean Med Sci 2015; 30: 1545-1552.
[14]
O’Connor A. E. A review of the accuracy of references in the Journal of Emergency Medicine [serial online]. Emerg Med. 2002 [cited 2007 June 12]; 14: 139-41.
[15]
Aronsky D, Ransom J, Robinson K. Accuracy of references in five Biomedical Infomatics Journals. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2005; 12 (2): 225-8.
[16]
Raveendran R. Accuracy of references: whose responsibility is it? [Editorial]. Indian J Pharmacol. 2003; 35: 280.
[17]
Siebers R. The accuracy of references of three allergy journals. Lancet. 2000; 356: 837-8.
[18]
Eichorn P, Yankauer A. Do authors check their references? A survey of accuracy of references in three public health journals. Am J Public Health. 1987; 77 (8): 1011-2.
[19]
Vargas-Origel A, Gomez-Martinez G, Vargas-Nieto MA. The accuracy of references in paediatric journals [serial online]. Arch Dis Child. 2001 [cited 2007 Jul 12]; 85: 497-8.
[20]
Hansen ME, Mclntire DD. References citations in radiology: accuracy and appropriateness of use in two major journals. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163; 719-23.
[21]
Roland CG. Thoughts about medical writing. XXXVII: verify your references. Anesth Analg. 1976; 55: 717-8.
[22]
Masic I. How to Search, Write, Prepare and Publish the Scientific Papers in the Biomedical Journals. AIM 2011; 19 (2): 68-79.
[23]
Daud A, Shaikh AM, Rajpar AH. Scientific reference mining using semantic information through topic modeling. Research Journal of Engineering & Technology 2009; 28 (2):253-262.
[24]
Gipp B, Meuschke N, Lipinski M. CITREC: An Evaluation Framework for Citation-Based Similarity Measures based on TREC Genomics and PubMed Central. In Proceedings of the i Conference 2015, Newport Beach, California, 2015.
[25]
Basak SK. A Comparison of Researcher’s Reference Management Software: Refworks, Mendeley, and EndNote. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies 2014; 7 (6):561-568.
[26]
Gheondea EA. Conducting critical literature reviews: A methodological note. Quality of Life 2015; 26 (2):1018-0389/Calitatea Vietii.
[27]
Rabab A. A. Mohammed, Omar M. Shaaban, Dalia G. Mahran, Hamdi N. Attellawy, Ahmed Makhlof, Abdulkader Albasri. Plagiarism in medical scientific research. Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2015; 10 (1): 6-11.
[28]
Pierson DJ. The Top 10 Reasons Why Manuscripts Are Not Accepted for Publication. Respir Care 2004; 49 (10):1246–1252.
[29]
Rokni MB. How to discover plagiarism. In: Proceedings of First National Conference on Medical Editing. Rawalpindi. 23-25 April 2007. Pakistan Medical Journalists Association, Karachi. 2007:64-68.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved