Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Communities’ Willingness to Pay for Healthcare in Public Health Facilities of Nakasongola District, Uganda
Current Issue
Volume 3, 2015
Issue 5 (October)
Pages: 248-253   |   Vol. 3, No. 5, October 2015   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 25   Since Aug. 28, 2015 Views: 1753   Since Aug. 28, 2015
Authors
[1]
Damali Dakoye, Faculty of Health Sciences, Uganda Martyrs University, Kampala, Uganda.
[2]
Robert Anguyo DDM Onzima, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Kampala, Uganda.
[3]
Philip Govule, Faculty of Health Sciences, Uganda Martyrs University, Kampala, Uganda.
[4]
Simon Peter Katongole, Faculty of Health Sciences, Uganda Martyrs University, Kampala, Uganda.
[5]
Rogers Ayiko, East African Community Health Secretariat, Arusha, Tanzania.
[6]
Juliet Nabyonga-Orem, Health Systems & Services Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Abstract
Poor countries continue to register decreasing revenue to finance health care amidst rising demand with consequently growing out of pocket expenditure on health exceeding 35% of the total health care expenditure; this scenario is observed in more than three quarter of Sub-Saharan African countries. For Uganda, the situation is even worse with about half of the national health expenditure financed from out of pocket despite tax-based national health services. In response, Uganda’s Ministry of Health has placed health insurance at centre of financing health care in the medium term. This paper examines willingness to pay for health care in line with the planned policy of Uganda. We evaluated: willingness to pay for the health care in public health facilities; household characteristics associated with willingness to pay; how much households were willing to pay; and the preferred mode of payment. Methods: We interviewed 376 household heads or their representatives in four sub-counties of Nakasongola district for willingness to pay for the current or improved quality of health care in public health facilities. In order to explore how much the households were willing to pay per capita member of household per annum, we employed the contingency valuation method using the ‘open-ended’ bidding game. Results: Majority, 56.7% (199) of the respondents were not willing to pay for health care in public health facilities at the current level of quality. Willingness to pay grew from 43.3% (152) to 83.5% (293) for improved quality of care in public health facilities. Major operations, in-patient therapeutic care and health facility deliveries in that order were the services communities were most willing to pay for if quality of care matched their expectation. The median willingness to pay was Ugandan shillings 4,888 ($1.56) (range 0-10,000 [$3.19]) and once-annual prepayment was preferred by majority of respondents. Female-household headship, high-level of education of household head and belonging to lower income quintiles were positively associated with willingness to pay. Conclusion: The communities in Nakasongola district are willing to pay for health care in public health facilities provided the quality of care is improved. Given the low median amount of willingness to pay and the fact that persons from poor households were more willing to pay, planners of Health Insurance programs should devise progressive premium calculation mechanisms and further plan for government subsidy in order to take care of the poor.
Keywords
Willingness to Pay, Health Care, Public Health Facilities, Nakasongola District
Reference
[1]
World Health Organization. World health report. Health system financing: a path to universal coverage. Geneva: World Health Organization Press, 2010.
[2]
Gottret P and Schieber G. Health financing revisited. A practitioner’s guide. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 2006.
[3]
Xu K, Evans DB, Kadama P, Nabyonga J, Ogwal PO, Nabukhonzo P, & Aguilar AM. Understanding the impact of eliminating user fees: utilization and catastrophic health expenditures in Uganda. Social Science & Medicine, 2006; 62(4): 866-876.
[4]
Government of Uganda. Report on cost sharing. Kampala: Ministry of Health, 1999.
[5]
Deininger K. and Mpuga P. Economic and welfare effects of abolition of user fees: evidence from Uganda. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3276, 2004. Available from: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/14303/wps3276health.pdf?sequence=1. (Viewed on 30/5/20150.
[6]
Nabyonga J, Desmet M, Karamagi H, Kadama PY, Omaswa FG and Walker O. Abolition of cost sharing is pro-poor: evidence from Uganda. Health policy and planning, 2005; 20(2):100-108.
[7]
Ministry of Health. Uganda health accounts; national health expenditure financial year 2010/2011 – 2011/2012, 2015.
[8]
Ministry of Health. Health sector strategic investment plan 2010/11-2014/15: promoting people’s health to enhance socio-economic development. Kampala: Ministry of Health, 2010.
[9]
Zweifel P, Breyer F and Kifmann M. Health Economics. 2nd Ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009.
[10]
Uganda Bureau of statistics and MACRO International Inc. Uganda demographic and health survey 2006. Calverton, Maryland, USA: Uganda Bureau of statistics and MACRO International Inc, 2006.
[11]
Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development. Uganda participatory poverty assessment report. Kampala: Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, 2000.
[12]
World Health Organization. Training for mid-level managers (MLM). The EPI coverage survey. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2008.
[13]
Masiye F and Rehnberg C. The economic value of an improved malaria treatment programme in Zambia: results from a contingent valuation survey. Malaria J, 2005; 4 (60): doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-4-60.
[14]
Aizuddin AN, Sulong S, & Aljunid SM Factors influencing willingness to pay for healthcare. BMC Public Health, 2012; 12 (Suppl 2): A37.
[15]
Orem JN, Mugisha F, Kirunga C, Macq J, and Criel B. "Abolition of user fees: the Uganda paradox." Health Policy and Planning, 2011; 26, (2): ii41-ii51.
[16]
Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development (Uganda). Situation analysis report. Preparation of a physical development plan for albertine graben in Uganda. Kampala: Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development, 2014.
[17]
Uganda Vision 2040. [Internet]. Available at: http://npa.ug/wp-content/themes/npatheme/documents/vision2040.pdf. (Viewed on 13/6/2015).
[18]
Dong H, Kouyate B, Cairns J and Saurborn R. Differential willingness of household heads to pay community-based health insurance premia for themselves and other household members. Health Policy and Planning, 2004; 19(2): 120–126.
[19]
Saulo EC, Forsberg BC, Premji Z, Montogomery SM and Bjorkman A. Willingness and ability to pay for artemisinin-based combination therapy in rural Tanzania. Malaria Journal, 2008; 7:227, doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-227.
[20]
Mazumdar S & Guruswamy M. Demand and willingness to pay for healthcare in rural West Bengal. Social Change, 2009; 39.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved