Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
The Curve of Dental Arch in Normal Occlusion
Current Issue
Volume 3, 2015
Issue 2 (April)
Pages: 47-54   |   Vol. 3, No. 2, April 2015   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 60   Since Aug. 28, 2015 Views: 2211   Since Aug. 28, 2015
Authors
[1]
Abu-Hussein Muhamad, University of Naples Federic II, Naples, Italy, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
[2]
Watted Nezar, Department of Orthodontics, Arab American University, Jenin, Palestine.
[3]
Abdulgani Azzaldeen, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine.
Abstract
The development of human dentition from adolescence to adulthood has been the subject of extensive study by numerous dentists, orthodontists and other experts in the past. While prevention and cure of dental diseases, surgical reconstitution to address teeth anomalies and research studies on teeth and development of the dental arch during the growing up years has been the main concerns across the past decades, in recent years, substantial effort has been evident in the field of mathematical analysis of the dental arch curve, particularly of children from varied age groups and diverse ethnic and national origins. The proper care and development of the primary dentition into permanent dentition is of major importance and the dental arch curvature, whose study has been related intimately by a growing number of dentists and orthodontists to the prospective achievement of ideal occlusion and normal permanent dentition, has eluded a proper definition of form and shape. Many eminent authors have put forth mathematical models to describe the teeth arch curve in humans. Some have imagined it as a parabola, ellipse or conic while others have viewed the same as a cubic spline. Still others have viewed the beta function as best describing the actual shape of the dental arch curve. Both finite mathematical functions as also polynomials ranging from 2nd order to 6th order have been cited as appropriate definitions of the arch in various studies by eminent authors. Each such model had advantages and disadvantages, but none could exactly define the shape of the human dental arch curvature and factor in its features like shape, spacing and symmetry/asymmetry. Recent advances in imaging techniques and computer-aided simulation have added to the attempts to determine dental arch form in children in normal occlusion. This paper presents key analysis models & compares them through some secondary research study.
Keywords
Dental Arch, Curve, Normal Occlussion
Reference
[1]
AlHarbi, S., Alkofide, E.A. and AlMadi, A., 2006, “Mathematical analysis of dental arch curvature in normal occlusion”, The Angle Orthodontist: Vol. 78, No. 2, pp. 281–287
[2]
Andrews LF, 1972, "The six keys to normal occlusion", American Journal of Orthodontics & Dento-facial Orthopaedics, 62(3): 296-309
[3]
Angle E.H., 1899, “Classification of malocclusion”, Dental Cosmos, 4: 248-264
[4]
Ash M.M., and Ramfjord S.P.1982, Occlusion, 3rd edn, Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co
[5]
Battagel J.M., 1996, “Individualized catenary curves: their relationship to arch form and perimeter”, British Journal of Orthodontics, 23:21–28.
[6]
BeGole E. A., 1980, “Application of the cubic spline function in the description of dental arch form”, J Dent Res., 59:1549–1556.
[7]
Biggerstaff, R.H., 1972, “Three variations in dental arch form estimated by a quadratic equation”, Journal of Dental Research, 51: 1509
[8]
Brader A C, 1972, “Dental arch form related to intra-oral force: PR = C”, American Journal of Orthodontics, 61: 541–561
[9]
Braun S, Hnat W P, Fender D E, and Legan H L, 1998, “The form of the dental arch”, Angle Orthodontist, 68: 29–36
[10]
Burris B G, and Harris F H, 2000, “Maxillary arch size and shape in American blacks and whites”, Angle Orthodontist, 70: 297–302
[11]
Buschang PH, Stroud J, and Alexander RG, 1994, “Differences in dental arch morphology among adult females with untreated Class I and Class II malocclusion”, European Journal of Orthodontics, 16: 47-52
[12]
Facal-Garcia M, de Nova-Garcia J, and Suarez-Quintanilla D., 2001, “The diastemas in deciduous dentition: the relationship to the tooth size and the dental arches dimensions”. J Clinical Paediatric Dentistry, 2001, 26:65-9.
[13]
Ferrario V F, Sforza C, and Miani Jr A, 1997, “Statistical evaluation of Monson’s sphere in healthy permanent dentitions in man”, Archives of Oral Biology, 42: 365–369
[14]
Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Colombo A, Ciusa V, and Serrao G, 2001, “3- dimensional inclination of the dental axes in healthy permanent dentitions – a cross-sectional study in normal population”, Angle Orthodontist, 71: 257–264
[15]
Ferrario V F, Sforza C, Poggio C E, Serrao G, and Colombo A, 1999, Three dimensional dental arch curvature in human adolescents and adults”, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dento-facial Orthopaedics, 115: 401–405
[16]
Harris E F, 1997, “A longitudinal study of arch size and form in untreated Adults”, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dento-facial Orthopaedics, 111: 419–427
[17]
Hayashi, T., 1962, “A Mathematical Analysis of the Curve of the Dental Arch”, Bull, Tokyo Medical Dental University, 3: 175-218
[18]
Hendrikson, J., Persson, M., and Thilander, B., 2001, “Long term stability of dental arch in normal occlusion from 13 to 31 years of age”, European Journal of Orthodontics, Pub 23: 51-61
[19]
Houston WJB, Stephens CD and Tulley WJ, 1992, A Textbook of Orthodontics, Great Britain: Wright, pp.1-13.
[20]
Jones, M.L. and Richmond, S., 1989, “An assessment of the fit of a parabolic curve to pre- and post-treatment dental arches”, British Journal of Orthodontics, 16: 85-93
[21]
Lu, K.H., 1966, “An Orthogonal Analysis of the Form, Symmetry and Asymmetry of the Dental Arch”, Oral Biology, 11: 1057-1069
[22]
McDonald, F and Ireland A J, 1998, Diagnosis of the Orthodontic Patient, New York: Oxford University Press
[23]
Noroozi H, Hosseinzadeh Nik T, and Saeeda R, 2001, “The dental arch form revisited”, Angle Orthodontist, 71: 386–389
[24]
Oltramari PVP, Conti AC de Castro F, Navarro R de Lima, de Almeida MR, de Almeida-Pedrin RR, and Ferreira FPC, 2007, “Importance of Occlusion Aspects in the Completion of Orthodontic Treatment”, Brazilian Dental Journal, 18 (1), ISSN 0103-6440
[25]
Pepe, S.H., 1975, “Polynomial and catenary curve fits to human dental arches”, J Dent Res. 54: 1124–1132.
[26]
Poggio C E, Mancini E, and Salvato A, 2000, “Valutazione degli effetti sulla forma d’arcata della terapia fi ssa e della recidiva mediante la thin plate spline analysis”, Ortognatodonzia Italiana, 9: 345–350
[27]
Prabhakaran S, Sriram CH, Muthu MS, Rao CR, and Sivakumar N., 2006, “Dental arch dimensions in primary dentition of children aged three to five years in Chennai and Hyderabad”, Indian Journal of Dental Research, Chennai, India, Retrieved from the World Wide Web Feb 24, 2009: http://www.ijdr.in/text.asp?2006/17/4/185/29866
[28]
Ross I.F., 1970, Occlusion: A concept for the clinician, St. Louis: Mosby Company.
[29]
Roth RH, 1981, “Functional occlusion for the orthodontist”, Journal of Clinical Orthodontics, 15: 32-51
[30]
Sampson, P. D., 1981, “Dental arch shape: a statistical analysis using conic sections”, American Journal of Orthodontics, 79:535–548.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved