Effectiveness of Activated Groundnut Shells to Remove Chromium from Tannery Wastewater
[1]
William J. S. Mwegoha, College of Earth Sciences, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
[2]
Meserecordias W. J. Lema, College of Earth Sciences, University of Dodoma, Dodoma, Tanzania.
This paper presents results of the investigation of Chromium III removal from tannery wastewater using groundnut shells under laboratory scale batch experiments. The effects of pH, contact time, particle size and dosage of the adsorbent on the adsorption of Cr (III) were studied. Determination of Chromium ion concentration in the wastewater was done using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (AAS). Results show that removal mechanism is dominantly adsorption, which is dependent of the physical and chemical characteristics of the material. The main constituent of groundnut shell is carbon, potentially making it suitable for making activated carbon for adsorption experiments. From the initial concentration of 6.643 ppm, optimum Cr (III) removal was obtained at pH of 4, particle size of 0.25mm, contact time of 180 minutes and adsorbent dosage of 20g, with highest efficiency of 98.013%, corresponding to final concentration of 0.132ppm. The adsorption process was found to obey the Freundlich adsorption isotherm with R2 being 0.9613. Overall, the adsorption capacity of the activated groundnut shell was found to be 2.6172mg/g which ensures that they can be used for the removal of Chromium III from tannery wastewater.
Adsorption, Batch, Groundnut, Wastewater, Tannery
[1]
Akan, J. C., Moses, E. A., Ogugbuaja, V. O., & Abah, I. (2007). Assessment of Tannery Industrial Effluents from Kano Metropolis, Kano State, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences, 7(19), 2788-2793.
[2]
Sarin, V., & Pant, K. (2006). Removal of chromium from industrial waste by using eucalyptus bark. Bioresource technology, 97(1), 15-20.
[3]
Mohan, D., Singh, K. P., & Singh, V. K. (2006). Trivalent chromium removal from wastewater using low cost activated carbon derived from agricultural waste material and activated carbon fabric cloth. Journal of hazardous materials, 135(1), 280-295.
[4]
Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (2000). Ecological conflicts and environmental movements in India. Development: Challenges for development, 6, 254.
[5]
Sharma, I. & Goyal, D. (2009). Chromium (III) removal from tannery effluent by Streptomyces sp. (MB2) waste biomass of fermentation process. International Journal of Integrative Biology, 6(3), 148.
[6]
Rengaraj S. K. Y. and Seung, H. M. (2001). Removal of chromium from water and wastewater by ion exchange resins. Journal of hazardous material, 87 (273–287).
[7]
Babel, S., & Kurniawan, T. A. (2004). Cr (VI) removal from synthetic wastewater using coconut shell charcoal and commercial activated carbon modified with oxidizing agents and/or chitosan. Chemosphere, 54(7), 951-967.
[8]
Ajmal, M., Rao, R. A., Anwar, S., Ahmad, J. and Ahmad, R. (2003). Adsorption studies on rice husk: removal and recovery of Cd (II) from wastewater. Bioresour. Technol., 86, 147-149.
[9]
Malik, R., Ramteke, D. S., & Wate, S. R. (2006). Physico-chemical and surface characterization of adsorbent prepared from groundnut shell by ZnCl~ 2 activation and its ability to absorb colour. Indian journal of chemical Technology, 13(4), 319.
[10]
Ng, C. (2001). Use of agricultural by-product based granular activated carbon for the adsorption of geosmin and process and economic analysis for their production. M. S. Thesis. Louisiana State University. Baton Rouge. Louisiana
[11]
Federation, W. E., & American Public Health Association. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, DC, USA.
[12]
Amuda, O. S., Giwa, A., & Bello, I. A. (2007). Removal of heavy metal from industrial wastewater using modified activated coconut shell carbon. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 36(2), 174-181.
[13]
Monser, L., & Adhoum, N. (2002). Modified activated carbon for the removal of copper, zinc, chromium and cyanide from wastewater. Separation and purification technology, 26(2), 137-146.
[14]
Tanzania Bureau of Standards (TBS) (2005), Municipal and Industrial Wastewaters General Tolerance Limits for Municipal and Industrial Wastewaters (TZS860:2005). National Environmental Standards Compendium, Tanzania Bureau of Standards. pp 6-8.
[15]
Bradl, H. B. (2004). Adsorption of heavy metal ions on soils and soils constituents. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 277(1), 1-18.
[16]
Bhattacharya, A. K., Naiya, T. K., Mandal, S. N., & Das, S. K. (2008). Adsorption, kinetics and equilibrium studies on removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solutions using different low-cost adsorbents. Chemical engineering journal, 137(3), 529-541.
[17]
Bishnoi, N. R., Bajaj, M., Sharma, N., & Gupta, A. (2004). Adsorption of Cr (VI) on activated rice husk carbon and activated alumina. Bioresource Technology, 91(3), 305-307.
[18]
Wong, K. K., Lee C. K., Low K. S. and Haron, M. J. (2003). Removal of Cu and Pb by tartaric acid modified rice husk from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere, 50: 23.
[19]
Fahim, N. F., Barsoum, B. N., Eid, A. E., & Khalil, M. S. (2006). Removal of chromium (III) from tannery wastewater using activated carbon from sugar industrial waste. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136(2), 303-309.
[20]
Choudhury, T. R., Khalil M, Ali M. I, Quraishi S. B, (2012). Adsorption of Cr (III) from aqueous solution by groundnut shell, Department of Applied chemistry and chemical Engineering, Dhaka University, Bangladesh.
[21]
Namane, A., Mekarzia, A., Benrachedi, K., Belhaneche-Bensemra, N., & Hellal, A. (2005). Determination of the adsorption capacity of activated carbon made from coffee grounds by chemical activation with ZnCl 2 and H 3 PO 4. Journal of hazardous materials, 119(1), 189-194.