Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Differences between Traditional Systems and Modern Suggestion System
Current Issue
Volume 2, 2014
Issue 2 (April)
Pages: 64-69   |   Vol. 2, No. 2, April 2014   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 56   Since Aug. 28, 2015 Views: 1774   Since Aug. 28, 2015
Authors
[1]
Ali Pakdel , Faculty of Management & Human Resources Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.
[2]
Shah Rollah Abdul Wahab , Faculty of Management & Human Resources Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.
[3]
Maliheh Lotfi , Faculty of Management & Human Resources Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.
Abstract
Promoting working life and providing meaningful and real participation of employees is an instrument for responding to rapid transformation and enhancing the organizational expectance. Employees in today's organizations looking for involvement in the workplace more than everything else, that, it's accomplished by implementing suggestion system. Suggestion system includes two parts, traditional and modern suggestion system, that traditional parts have developed in western countries and modern that practiced in Japan. It is believed that the modern suggestion system could assist organizations and employees for performing and utilizing from advantage of this system. This paper, discusses ten major differences between traditional and modern suggestion system.
Keywords
Suggestion System, Kaizen, Management Support, Performance, Productivity
Reference
[1]
A. Brem, and K. Voigt, “Innovation management in emerging technology ventures-the concept of an integrated idea management.” International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 2007, 7 (3), 304–321.
[2]
A. Coleman, “Need ideas? Ask your staff.” Director Human Resources Development and Management, 2007, 61 (1), 1–27.
[3]
B. Frederick, & Kenneth; Chaney; S. Teel. "Participative Management". A Practical Experience, Personal. 1972.
[4]
B. Norman, “Ouick and Easy Kaizen”/ IIE Solution, 2002.
[5]
C. Clegg, K. Unsworth, O. Epitropaki, and G. Parker, “Implicating trust in the innovation process.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2002, 75 (4), 409–22.
[6]
C. M, Axtell, D. J. Holman, T. D. Unsworth, T. D. Wall, P. E. Waterson, and E. Harrington, “Shopfloor innovation: Facilitating the suggestions and implementation of ideas.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 2000, 73 (3), 265–285.
[7]
D. Stenmark, “Company-wide brainstorming: next generation suggestion systems?” [In L. Svensson, U. Snis, C. Sørensen, H. F¨agerlind, M. Magnusson, C. Ostlund (2000) (Eds). Proceedings of IRIS 23. Laboratorium for Interaction Technology, University of Trollh¨attan Uddevalla], 2000,pp.1–13.
[8]
G. R. Oldham and A. Cummings, “Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work.” Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39 (3), 607–634.
[9]
J. P. Darragh, “A suggestion system that works for you.” Super Vision, 2005, 66 (7), p. 18.
[10]
K. K. Bhatti and T. M. Qureshi, “Impact of employee participation on job satisfaction, employee commitment and employee productivity.” International Review of Business Research Papers, 2007, 3 (2), 54–68.
[11]
M. Imai, “Kaizen: The Key to Japans Competitive Success,” Random House, New York, NY, 1986.
[12]
M. Barak, T. Maymon, and G. Harel, “Teamwork in modern organizations: Implications for technological education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1999, 9 (1), 85–101.
[13]
M. Basadur, “Managing creativity: A Japanese model.” Academy of Management Executive, 1992, 6, 29–40.
[14]
M. Frese, E. Teng, and C. J. D. Wijnen, “Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies.” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 1999, 20 (7), 1139–1155.
[15]
M. Golestan Hashemi. "The Role of Cooperative Management in Development Process ". Industrial Management Organization. 1999.
[16]
N. N. Lavinia, and V. M. Klein, “Employee Suggestion system (Kaizen Teian) the bottom up approach for productivity improvement.” In International Conference on Economic Engineering and Manufacturing Systems, 2009, 361–367.
[17]
N. Sadeghi Fard, & Taghavi, A. "Cooperative Management". Industrial Training and Research Center Iran. Tehran. 2006.
[18]
R. Recht and C. Wilderom, “Kaizen and culture: On the transferability of Japanese suggestion systems.” International Business Review, 1998, 7 (1), 7–22.
[19]
R. Schuring and H. Luijten, “Reinventing suggestion systems for continuous improvement.” International Journal of Technology Management, 2001, 22 (4), 359–372.
[20]
S. Haghayegh, & Arkian S. "How to Enact Cooperative Management System". Navid Shiraz, Publication. 2005.
[21]
T. M, Amabile. “Creativity in context, 2nd ed, Boulder,” CO, Westview Press, 1996.
[22]
V. D. Buech, A. Michel, and K. Sonntag, “Suggestion systems in organizations: what motivates employees to submit suggestions?” European Journal of Innovation Management, 2010, 13 (4), 507–525.
[23]
V. D. Christiaan and D. E. Jan van, “Suggestion systems: transferring employee creativity into practicable ideas.” R and D Management, 2002, 32 (5), 387–395.
[24]
V. Dijk and E. J. Van, “Suggestion systems: transferring employee creativity into practicable ideas.” R and D Management, 2002, 32 (5), 387–95.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved