Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Issues and Priorities in CSR Initiatives: Context and Methodological Discourse
Current Issue
Volume 4, 2016
Issue 5 (October)
Pages: 107-113   |   Vol. 4, No. 5, October 2016   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 51   Since Sep. 9, 2016 Views: 1617   Since Sep. 9, 2016
N. Ravichandran, Faculty of Management, Jamia Hamdard, Hamdard University, New Delhi, India.
To draw the methodological and research issues that exist in CSR arena and generates ideas for moving forwardithCSR initiatives as an inter-disciplinary approach to improve the relevance of CSR in totality. This article adoptedphenomenological approach in addressing strengths and weakness of the CSR initiatives to date with their wide-range of contextual understanding and empirical detail, with reference to eastern societies. This itself reflects a very little work which has been done in the ‘east’; this paper is inductive and explorative one rather. Starting from the changing concept of CSR and imperialism to discourse of CSR effects and characteristics how practitioner in eastern societies and their continued adoption of Western modelling required to be re-visited in the context of methodological content. However, means and routes of CSR are built on ‘west’ initiatives and their perceptions of the tensions and contradictions that seek to oblige the moral guidelines required contextual changes in the researchers’ perspectives. The importance of linking both Eastern and Western contexts of research and practice, and build opportunities for providing more effective linkages between researchers and research users is the need of the hour. The present study provides a starting-point for advance research in the CSR arena with the outlook of changing social responsibility in fulfilling its corporate governance and CSR mission. This calls for redefinitions and reassessment of CSR theories and models while looking at changing the nature of the relationship and responsibilities of the corporate. This article advocates for a strong contextual and research base for changed social responsibility beyond a trade-off between production and reward, and shall be looked into beyond philanthropy. This is a notable and promising side-effect of the phenomenological approach through exploratory research design, at least from a CSR point of view.
Corporate Social Responsibility, Regulation, Corporate Governance, Methodological Issues, Imperialism
Aaronson, Susan Ariel. (2003). Corporate Responsibility in the Global Village: The British Role Model and the American Laggard. Business and Society Review. Volume 108, Issue 3, pages 309–338, September 2003.
Ackerman, Robert and Bauer, Raymond (1976) Corporate Social Responsiveness: The Modern Dilemma, VA: Reston.
Ashcroft, Blake E., & Mael, Fred (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. The Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
Baker, J. (2001) OECD conference on corporate social responsibility, "Freedom of association and CSR": http://www.oecd.org/pdf/M00003000/M00003662.pdf.
Baker, Mallen. (2004). Corporate social Responsibility. http://mallenbaker.net/article/clear-reflection/definitions-of-corporate-social-responsibility-what-is-csr.
Balabanis, G., Phillips, H. C., J. Lyall. (1998) corporate social responsibility and economic performance in the top British companies: are they linked?European Business Review, 1998. 98 (1). pp. 25-44.
Bowen, Howard, R. (1953). The Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. USA: Harpers and Brothers. Business for Social Responsibility, (2002). Introduction to Corporate Social Responsibility: http://www.bsr.org/BSRResources/WhitePaperDetail.cfm?DocumentID=138.
Carroll, Archie B. (1979) ‘A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance”, Academy of Management Review, 4: 497-505.
Carroll, Archie B. (1999) ‘Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct’, Business and Society, 38(3), 268-295.
Competitive Commission of India (2011). http://www.cci.gov.in/sites/default/files/annual%20reports/EnglishAnnualReport201011.pdf
Dahl R A (1972); A prelude to corporate reform; Business & Society Review, Spring 1972, 17-23.
Davis, K. (1973). Corporate Social Responsibility: Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & SocietySeptember 199938: 268-295.
European Commission (2002). Corporate social responsibility: a business contribution to sustainable development. COM (2002) 347 final. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV%3An26034
The European Union. (2002). http://www.csreurope.org/csr-europe-calls-new-eu-csr-strategy-2015-2019-support-move-csr-compliance-innovation
Frank Abrams. (1951). Management’s Responsibilities in a Complex World. Harvard Business Review. May. 1951. 34 (48). Pp 29.
Hemingway, Christine (2002) A. An Exploratory Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility: Definitions, Motives and Values. Research Memorandum. Centre for Management and Organisational Learning Hull University Business School, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Khan, F. R and Lund, Thompson P. (2011). CSR as Imperialism: Towards a Phenomenological Approach to CSR in the Developing World. Journal of Change Management. Vol. 11. No. 1, pp 73-90. March 2011.
Kotler, P and Lee, N. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
Lewis, D and Ravichandran, N, (2008). Non-Governmental Organizations and Social Welfare: New Research Approaches. Jaipur: Rawat Publications. June 2008.
Lewis, D. (2005) ‘Individuals, organisations and public action: trajectories of the ‘non-governmental’ in development studies’. In A Radical History of Development Studies, ed. Uma Kothari. London: Zed Books.
Maclagan, P. W. (1998) Management and morality, London: Sage Publications.
McWilliams, A., D. Siegel. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A theory of Firm’s Perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 2001.26 (1). pp. 117-127.
Mosley, D., P. H. Pietri and L. C. Megginson (1996). Management: Leadership in Action. New York: Harper Collins.
Falck, O, and Heblich, S. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: Doing well by doing good. Business Horizons 50 (3), 247-254.
Patton, M. Q (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Paul Hohnen and Jason Potts (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility: An Implementation Guide for Business. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Manitoba. Canada.
Ravichandran, N (2003). Regulatory Challenges and Non-Profit Welfarism. Symposium of International Conference on Finance, ICFAI University, India and Philadelphia University, USA. December 15-16, 2003.
Ravichandran, N (2006a). Perspectives on Non-Profit Mission and Financing. Journal of Health Management. Vol. VIII. No.2. 2006. pp. 207-227. ISSN. 0972-0634.
Ravichandran, N (2006b). The Non-Governmental Perspectives: South-Asian Perspectives. Ed. The Journal of Health Management. Vol. VIII. No. December 2006. pp. 155-160. ISSN. 0972-0634.
Ravichandran, N (2006c). Regulatory Challenges and Non-profit Welfarism: Implications and a Sustainable Framework of Choice. The Journal of Health Management. Vol. VIII. No. 2. December 2006. pp 295-305. ISSN. 0972-0634.
Ravichandran, N (2007a). Organizing the Unorganized: The Cross-Cultural Outlook of NGOs. Journal of Health Management. Vol. X. No. 2. 2007. pp 177-179. ISSN. 0972-0634.
Ravichandran, N and Rajashree, S (2007b). Financing Sustainability and Globalization: Practicing of Preaching through NPOs Perceptives. Journal of Health Management. Vol. X. No. 2. 2007. pp. 201-222. ISSN. 0972-0634.
Ravichandran, N (2007c). NGOs’ Efficiency and their Sustainability Reforms: Impact Analysis through Data Envelopment Approach. Proceedings of Second National Conference on Management Science and Practice, Indian Institute of Technology, Chennai. March 9-11, 2007.
Ravichandran, N (2012). Responsibility, Responsiveness and Performance: Assessing NGOs’ Social Contract through Efficiency Analysis. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. Vol-2 No. 1. Jan 2012. ISSN: 2231-5780. January 2012.
Schutz, A. (1977). Concepts and Theory formation in the Social Sciences in F. R Dallmayr and T. A McCarthy (eds). Understanding and Social Inquiry, pp. 225-239. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.
The India Companies Act 2013. (2013) CII-ITC Centre of Excellence for Sustainable Development. New Delhi: CII Press.
Victor, B. and Cullen, J. B. (1988) The organizational bases of ethical work climates, Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, pp. 101-125.
Westwood, R. (2006). International Business and Management Studies as a oreintalist discourse: a Postcolonial critique. Critical Perspectives on International Business. 2(2), pp. 91-113.
World Bank Institute, (2001). An Introduction to Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainable Competitiveness A Web-based Course. Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainable Competitiveness World Bank Institute. Japan.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2001). The Business Case for sustainable Development: Making a Difference toward the Johannesburg Submit 2002. And Beyond. Geneva: WBCSD.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2015). Meeting changing expectations. Netherlands: WBCSD Publications.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved