Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Getting Development Aid Equipped for the Post-2015 Development Agenda
Current Issue
Volume 3, 2015
Issue 5 (October)
Pages: 288-299   |   Vol. 3, No. 5, October 2015   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 36   Since Sep. 29, 2015 Views: 1083   Since Sep. 29, 2015
Authors
[1]
Peder Hjorth, Department of Water Resources Engineering, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Abstract
The United Nations has recently begun developing its Post-2015 Development Agenda, grounded in respect for universal human rights, reflecting the widespread understanding that poverty-reduction objectives need a higher profile and a commitment and willingness befitting the global challenge of sustainable development. Achieving the effective implementation of this will require major changes and a thorough disentangling of the development assistance nexus. This article discusses the main implementation challenges and provides a framework, counter to the routine terms of reference with which the development industry has been operating within its TINA (there is no alternative) worldview. A strong case is made about the importance of a development industry breakout from the prevailing, engrained path of normal ‘professionalism’ with its quest for ‘status quo. It is asserted, and deplored, that within the development industry, the ideal of sustainable development has become a moth-eaten banner, an emblem in its final misery and a simple catchword. The paper tries to explore what we can actually know (as researchers or practitioners) about what kinds of aid work and discusses needed changes in order to make aid work better. Clearly, today’s global challenges cannot be approached in silos: progress in all of them is required at the same time. There is a need for holistic learning approaches that take into account the issue of sustainability in all its dimensions. The paper underlines the importance of credible means to implement the future agenda so that development truly benefits the people. Therefore, it presents a longitudinal, descriptive analysis which can serve as a basis for an informed analysis of the routines and mainstream frameworks within which the development industry operates. It points to a number of historical examples that show how learning has been stymied, and valid criticism and good ideas have been washed away by a flood of “buzzwords and fuzzwords”, and represents an effort to offer fresh perspectives and alternatives for development assistance, in order to prevent it from continuing in the same old track. Fragmented and uncoordinated projects based on donors’ own policy priorities, according to engrained systems, must not be allowed to continue. Finally, it is concluded that the new development agenda requires the development industry to adopt a learning attitude, institute changes, and find new practices that can stand up to, and ultimately meet, the challenges of a development agenda for sustainability.
Keywords
Development Assistance, Sustainable Development, the Post-2015 Development Agenda, Learning, Change, Catchwords, World Bank, Development Industry, Rhetoric, Status Quo, Poverty
Reference
[1]
World Commission on Environment and Development. “Our Common Future” Oxford University Press, 1987.
[2]
A. H. T. Fergus, A. H. T. and J. I. A. Rowney, J. I. A. “Sustainable Development: Lost Meaning and Opportunity?” Journal of Business Ethics August 2005, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 17-27.
[3]
Esteva, G. “Development” in “The Development Dictionary A Guide to Knowledge as Power” Sachs, W. (ed) Zed Books, London and New Jersey 1992.
[4]
“Delivering the post-2015 development agenda. Opportunities at the national and local levels” United Nations Development Group, 2014 United Nations Development Group 2014.
[5]
UN Development Solutions Network (Jeffrey Sachs, 2012) focus on 10 critical areas for sustainable development. Output: Report, An Action Agenda for Sustainable Development.
[6]
Esteva, G., Babones, S. & Philipp Babcicky “The Future of Development: A Radical Manifesto” Bristol: Policy Press, 2013
[7]
Corbridge, S (1998) 'Beneath the pavement only soil': the poverty of post-development [Review Article]. Journal of Development Studies, 34 (6). pp. 138-148.
[8]
Sindzingre, A. N. “From Growth to Poverty Reduction: a New Conceptual Framework in Development Economics.” Paper presented at "Poverty and Misery in the History of Economic Thought", Nov 2008, Lille, France.
[9]
King, K. “A Personal Reflection – Learning and Development Aid, 1960-2000”. In Carlsson, J. and Wohlgemuth, L. (Eds) “Learning in development co-operation” Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm, 2001.
[10]
Rydin, Y. “Governing for Sustainable Urban Development” Earthscan, 2010.
[11]
Innis, H. (1951) “The Bias of Communication” Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1951.
[12]
Howard, P. “The Confrontation of Modern and Traditional Knowledge Systems in Development” Canadian Journal of Communication Vol 19, No. 2, 1994.
[13]
Ingrid Richter, I. “Organization development as a source: riding the pendulum between clocks and clouds - the history of organizational development in its relation to capacity development”, in: Ubels, J., N. Acquaye-Baddoo and A. Fowler (eds) 'Capacity Development in Practice', Earthscan, pp. 101-115, 2010.
[14]
Klein, J. T. "Interdisciplinarity and complexity: An evolving relationship" E:CO Special Double Issue Vol. 6 Nos. 1-2 2004 pp. 2-10.
[15]
Fardon, R., ed. “Localizing strategies: regional traditions of ethnographic writing”. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press., 1990.
[16]
Scoones, I. “ Localizing strategies: regional traditions of ethnographic writing. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development” The Journal of Peasant Studies Vol. 36, No. 1, January 2009, 171–196.
[17]
DfID guidance. Quoted at http://www.chronicpoverty.org/toolbox/Livelihoods.php; see sheets at www.livelihoods.org/info/guidance_sheets_pdfs/sect8glo.p.
[18]
Cassen, R. et al., 1986, Does Aid Work? Oxford: Clarendon Press.
[19]
Mosley, P., 1987, Overseas Aid. Its Defense and Reform. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
[20]
Bauer, P. T. “Equality, the Third World and Economic Delusion”. London: Methuen 1992.
[21]
Berg, E. “Rethinking Technical Cooperation. Reforms for Capacity Building in Africa” New York: UNDP, 1993.
[22]
Burnside, C. and Dollar, D. “Aid Policies and Growth”, Policy Research Working Paper no. 1777. Washington: World Bank, 1997.
[23]
Jerker Carlsson, J. and Lennart Wohlgemuth, L. “Learning in Development Co-operation – an Introduction” In Carlsson, J. and Wohlgemuth, L. (Eds) “Learning in development co-operation” Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm, 2001.
[24]
Wolfensohn, J. “Development aid needs fixing” International Herald Tribune 8 December 1999.
[25]
Schneider, B. (1988) The Barefoot Revolution: A Report to the Club of Rome IT Publications, London.
[26]
Lele, S. (1991) “Sustainable Development: A Critical Review” World Development, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 607-621, 1991.
[27]
Eade, D. “Preface” In Cornwall, A. and Deborah Eade, D. (Eds) Deconstructing Development Discourse Buzzwords and Fuzzwords Published by Practical Action Publishing in association with Oxfam GB, 2010.
[28]
Woods, N. (ed.) “New Directions in Development Assistance” Conference report University of Oxford/Cornell University Conference 11-12 June 2007 Rhodes House South Parks Road, Oxford.
[29]
Moyo, D. “Dead Aid: Why Aid is Not Working and How There is Another Way for Africa” Macmillan Publishers, 2009.
[30]
Collier, P. “Dead Aid, By Dambisa Moyo Time to turn off the aid tap?” The Independent, Friday 30 January 2009.
[31]
Wapenhans, W. “Effective Implementation: Key to Development Impact” Report of the Portfolio Management Task Force. Washington, DC: World Bank, 1992.
[32]
The World Bank Learning and Results in World Bank Operations: How the Bank Learns Jul 1, 2014 https://ieg.worldbankgroup.org/Data/reports/chapters/learning_results_ev.
[33]
Wapenhans, W. A. Learning by Doing: Reflections on 35 Years with the World Bank. In Carlsson, J. and Wohlgemuth, L. (Eds) “Learning in development co-operation” Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm, 2001.
[34]
Cato Institute Foreign Policy Briefing no. 79, September 17, 2003 .
[35]
Guttal, S. ”Globalization” Development in Practice Volume 17, Issue 4-5, 2007.
[36]
Dollar, D. and Pritchett, L. “Assessing aid - what works, what doesn't, and why.” World Bank policy research report. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 1998. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1998/11/438890/assessing-aid-works-doesnt.
[37]
Cato Handbook for Congress www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb105/105-57.pdf‎.
[38]
World Bank. “Transforming the Bank’s Knowledge Agenda: A Framework for Action” Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010.
[39]
Ebrahim, A. and Herz, S. (2007) “World Bank Responses to Civil Society” World Bank Working paper 08-027.
[40]
Suhrke, A. “From One Crisis to Another: Organizational Learning in UNHCR” In Carlsson, J. and Wohlgemuth, L. (Eds) “Learning in development co-operation” Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm, 2001
[41]
Palast, G. IMF's four steps to damnation. The Guardian, 29 April, 2001. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2001/apr/29/business.mbas.
[42]
Rodrik, D. “What is wrong (and right) in economics?” http://rodrik.typepad.com/dani_rodriks_weblog/2013/05/what-is-wrong-and-right-in-economics.html.
[43]
UN, Realizing the future we want for all: Report to the Secretary-General. New York, June, 2012.
[44]
UN The United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development - or Rio+20 - took place in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil on 20-22 June 2012.
[45]
Palacio, A. “The Mealy-Mouthed West” Project Syndicate, April 15, 2015. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/politician-empty-rhetoric-by-ana-palacio-2015-04.
[46]
Pearse, S. and Sheehan, M. “Stuck in a Rut” traps and how to break out of them. Mindmancer 14 January, 2014 https://mindgardener.com/fears/5-stuck-in-a-rut-traps-and-how-to-break-out-of-them/.
[47]
Jerker Carlsson, J “Learning from Evaluations” In J. and Wohlgemuth, L. (Eds) “Learning in development co-operation” Almqvist & Wiksell International Stockholm, 2001.
[48]
Rudqvist, A., Christoplos, I. and Liljelund, A. “Poverty reduction, sustainability, and learning” Sida Studies in Evaluation 00/4, Sida, Stockholm, 2000.
[49]
Ostrom, E, C. Gibson, S. Shivakumar, and K. Andersson (2002) “Aid, Incentives, and Sustainability - An Institutional Analysis of Development Cooperation.” Summary report. Sida Studies in Evaluation 02/01:1.
[50]
Beck, U. “World Risk Society” Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1998.
[51]
Reeler, D. “A theory of social change and implications for practice, planning, monitoring and evaluation” Community Development Resource Association, Cape Town, 2007.
[52]
Lansu, A., Boon, J., Sloep, P. B., & Van Dam-Mieras, M. C. E. “Learning in networks for sustainable development” In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 249-256), Aalborg, Denmark, 2010.
[53]
Guijt, I. Exploding the Myth of Incompatibility between Accountability and Learning In: Capacity Development in Practice: Complete Publication Edited by Jan Ubels, Naa-Aku Acquaye-Baddoo and Alan Fowler. Published 2010.
[54]
Hamel, G. “What Matters Now” Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 2012.
[55]
Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (Eds.) “Participation: The New Tyranny?” New York: Zed Books, 2001.
[56]
Douglas, M. “How Institutions Think” Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1986.
[57]
Ackoff, R. L. “Redesigning the Future” New York/London, Wiley, 1974.
[58]
Huppert, W. “Coping with complexity. Innovative approaches to an emerging issue in agricultural water management” International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD), 2009.
[59]
Banerjee, A. and Duflo, E. “Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty” Public Affairs, 2011.
[60]
Funtowicz, S. O. and J. R. Ravetz "A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues." In: “Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability” Ed. Robert Costanza. New York: Columbia University Press: 137–152, 1991.
[61]
Hirshleifer, J. "Urban Water Supply: A Second Look" The American economic review. Vol. 57.1967, pp. 169-178.
[62]
Dlamini, N. (2006) “Transparency of Process: Monitoring and Evaluation in the Learning Organization” CDRA, Woodstock, South Africa, www.cdra.org.za/AnnualRep/2006%20-%20M%20and%20E%20in%20Learning%20Organizations.doc.
[63]
Britton, B. “Self-Reflection - Monitoring and Evaluation for Personal Learning In: Capacity Development in Practice: Complete Publication Edited by Jan Ubels, Naa-Aku Acquaye-Baddoo and Alan Fowler. Published 2010.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved