Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News Unsubscribe Page
Exploratory Research on Customers’ Resistance to Adopt Mobile Banking: A Case of Pakistan
Current Issue
Volume 3, 2015
Issue 2 (April)
Pages: 92-97   |   Vol. 3, No. 2, April 2015   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 33   Since Aug. 28, 2015 Views: 1156   Since Aug. 28, 2015
Authors
[1]
Faheem Gul Gilal, Dongling School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, P. R. China.
[2]
Yang Jianhua, Dongling School of Economics and Management, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, P. R. China.
[3]
Rehman Gul Gilal, Department of Business Administration, Shah Abdul Latif University, Khairpur, Pakistan.
[4]
Rukhsana Gul, School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, P. R. China.
Abstract
This study aimed at to investigate the factors, which cause resistance to adopt mobile banking in Pakistan. This study used non-probabilistic sampling technique; particularly convenience and judgmental techniques were applied. The total sample size for this study was 300 (N=300) respondents, who enrolled in undergraduate, graduate and doctoral degree programs in top Business Schools of Pakistan. Finally, the data was analyzed by using inferential statistics, particularly one sample t-test and crosstabs techniques were adopted. The results of this study revealed that respondents are reluctant to adopt mobile banking service in Pakistan, due to the facts that respondents feel new technology is too much complicated, they believe mobile banking does not offer any comparative advantage, changing PIN codes in mobile banking is not convenient, mobile banking service does not increase capability to control financial matters, respondents think that mobile banking service is difficult to use and there will be no any privacy.
Keywords
Mobile Banking, Innovation, Customer’s Resistance, Usage Barrier, Value Barrier, Traditional Barrier, Image Barrier, Risk Barrier
Reference
[1]
Bendapudi, N. & Robert P.L. (2003), “Psychological Implications of Customer Participation in Co-Production,” Journal of Marketing, 67 (January), 14-28.
[2]
Chernev, A. (2004), “Goal Orientation and Consumer Preference for the Status Quo”, Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (December), 557-565.
[3]
Churchill, G.A. (1979), “A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 16, February, pp. 64-73.
[4]
Danneels, E. & Elko J.K. (2001),“Product Innovativeness from the Firm’s Perspective: Its Dimensions and Their Relation with Project Selection and Performance,” Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 357-373.
[5]
Donner, J & C.A. (2008), “Tellez, Mobile banking and economic development: Linking adoption impact and use”, Asian Journal of Communication, Vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 318-332.
[6]
Goldenberg, J., Donald R.L., David, M. (2001), “The Idea Itself and the Circumstances of Its Emergence as Predictors of New Product Success”, Management Science, 47 (1), 69-84.
[7]
Gourville, J.T. (2005), “The Curse of Innovation: Why Innovative New Products Fail,” MSI Reports 05-044.
[8]
Gourville, J.T. (2006), “Eager Sellers, Stony Buyers. Understanding the Psychology of New-Product Adoption”, Harvard Business Review, June, 98-106.
[9]
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5thEdition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
[10]
Hair,J.F, Babin, B. , Money, A.H., Samouel, P., (2007), Essentials of Business Research Method, John Wiley And Sons, Inc.
[11]
Herbig, P.A. & Hugh, K. (1994), “The Effect of Information Overload on the Innovation Choice Process: Innovation Overload”, Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol.11 (2), 45-54.
[12]
Herrmann, R.O. (1993), “The Tactics of Consumer Resistance: Group Action and the Marketplace Exit”, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 20, 130-134.
[13]
Klein, Jill, G.N. Craig, S., Andre, J. (2004), “Why We Boycott: Consumer Motivations for Boycott Participation”, Journal of Marketing, 68 (July), 92-109.
[14]
Leppaniemi, M., Sinisalo, J., Karjaluoto, H. (2006), “A review of mobile marketing research”, International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 1(1), 2-12.
[15]
Meuter, M., Bitner, A.O., Brown, S. (2005), “Choosing among alternative service delivery modes: An investigation of customer trial of self-service technologies”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 61-83.
[16]
Meyers, L.S., Gamst, G., Guarino, A.J., (2006), “Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation, Sage Publications.
[17]
Nunnally, J.C. (1978), Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
[18]
Pousttchi, K., & Wiedemann, D. (2006), “A contribution to theory building for mobile marketing: Categorizing mobile marketing campaigns through case study research” Paper presented at the International Conference on Mobile Business, Copenhagen, Denmark.
[19]
Ram, S. & Sheth, J.N. (1989), "Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and its Solutions," Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6, 2, 5-14.
[20]
Sulaiman A., Jaafar, N.I., Mohezar, S. (2007), “An overview of mobile banking adoption among the urban community”, International Journal of Mobile Communications, Vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 157-168.
[21]
Suoranta, M, & Mattila, M. (2004), “Mobile banking and consumer behavior: New insights into the diffusion pattern”, Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 354-366.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved