Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News Unsubscribe Page
Differences in Work Motivation Between Public and Private Sector Organizations
Current Issue
Volume 3, 2015
Issue 2 (April)
Pages: 86-91   |   Vol. 3, No. 2, April 2015   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 25   Since Aug. 28, 2015 Views: 1431   Since Aug. 28, 2015
Authors
[1]
Zhou Dan, Tongren Polytechnic College, Guizhou, China.
Abstract
This study contributes to our understanding of the differences in work motivation between the public and private sectors. The nature and extent of differences between employees and organizations of the public and private sectors has long been a topic of academic debate. Although much of the debate has centered on structural differences between public and private organizations, there has also been a longstanding interest in the differences between public and private sector employees. We used the sample of 138 respondents in public sector and 221 respondents in private sector by using the Interval scale.
Keywords
Work Motivation, Public and Private Sector Organizations
Reference
[1]
Boyne.G.A, 2004, A ‘3Rs’ Strategy for Public Service Turnaround: Retrenchment, Repositioning and Reorganization, J. PUBLIC MONEY & MANAGEMENT, 1, 100-101.
[2]
Buelens.M, Broeck.M.V.D, 2007, An Analysis of Differences in Work Motivation between Public and Private Sector Organizations, J.Public Administration Review, 1, 65-69.
[3]
Brewer.G.A, Selden.S.C, Facer.R.L, 2000, Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation, J. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 256-261.
[4]
BENSON.S.G, DUNDIS.S.P, 2003, Understanding and motivating health care employees: integrating Maslow's hierarchy of needs, training and technology, Journal of Nursing Management, 11, 315–320.
[5]
Chen.G, Williams.D.W, 2007, How Political Support Influences Red Tape through Developmental Culture, The Policy Studies Journal, 35(3), 422-424.
[6]
Carole.L.J, 2007, Louisiana’s Ethical Culture and Its Eff ect on the Administrative Failures Following Katrina. Public Administration Review, 1, 60-62.
[7]
Chandrashekara.M, Walke.B.A, 1993, Meta-Analysis with Heteroscedastic Effects, Journal of Marketing Research, 30(2), 246-255.
[8]
Dewett.T, 2007, Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity inan R&D environment, J.compilation, 37(3), 197-200.
[9]
Florax.R.J.G.M, Groot.H.L.F.D, Mooij.R.A.D, 2002, Meta-analysis: A Tool for Upgrading Inputs of Macroeconomic Policy Models, J. Meta-Analysis and Macroeconomic Policy Models, 41(3), 06-10
[10]
Heckman'.J.J, 1979, Sample Selection Bias As A Specification Error, J. Econometrica, 47(1), 153-161
[11]
Lyons.S.T, Duxbury.L.E, Higgins.C.A, 2006, A Comparison of the Values and Commitment of Private Sector, Public Sector, and Para public Sector Employees, J. A Comparison of Values and Commitment, 45(3), 606-610.
[12]
Lan.Z, Rainey.H.G, 1992, Goals, Rules, and Effectiveness in Public, Private, and Hybrid Organizations: More Evidence on Frequent Assertions about Differences, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2(1), 5-28.
[13]
Parzefall.M.R, Huhtala.H, 2007, A Review of Employee Well-Being and Innovativeness: An Opportunity for a Mutual Benefit. compilation, 6(3),300- 302.
[14]
Perry.J.L, 1996, Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-22.
[15]
Reed.C.M, Meyer.K.P, 2004, Medicaid Managed Care for Children with Special Health Care Needs: Examining Legislative and Judicial Constraints on rivatization, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 64(2), 235-236.
[16]
Reif.w.e, m. Monczka.r.m, w. Newstrom.j.w, 1973, Perceptions of the Formal and the Informal Organizations: Objective Measurement through the Semantic Differential Technique, the Academy of Management Journal, 16(3), 389-403.
[17]
Wright.B.E, 2007, Public Service and Motivation: Does Mission Matter? J. Public Administration Review, 1, 55-57.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved