Welcome to Open Science
Contact Us
Home Books Journals Submission Open Science Join Us News
Adult ESL Learners’ Reading Accuracy: An Insight
Current Issue
Volume 2, 2015
Issue 5 (November)
Pages: 79-85   |   Vol. 2, No. 5, November 2015   |   Follow on         
Paper in PDF Downloads: 61   Since Oct. 23, 2015 Views: 1397   Since Oct. 23, 2015
Authors
[1]
Rafizah Mohd Rawian, School of Education and Modern Languages, College of Arts and Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia.
[2]
Ahmad Azman Mokhtar, School of Education and Modern Languages, College of Arts and Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia.
[3]
Mohamad Fadhili Yahaya, Academy of Language Studies, Universiti Teknologi MARA Perlis, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia.
Abstract
The study investigated the levels of reading accuracy of Malaysian adult ESL learners and the possible differences in the accuracy based on gender. 210 Diploma students from one of the local universities in Malaysia were selected as its samples. The research findings found that 99% of the learners’ reading accuracy abilities were at the Frustration and the Instructional Levels. Females obtained higher mean scores than the males. No significant difference in the mean scores of reading accuracy between males and female was found. Several recommendations were suggested in the efforts to enhance ESL learners’ reading accuracy.
Keywords
Reading Accuracy, Adult ESL Learners, Gender, Frustration Level, Instructional Level
Reference
[1]
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[2]
Alderson, J.C. (2000). Assessing reading. Cambridge: England Cambridge University Press.
[3]
Allington, Richard. L. (2009). What really matters in fluency: Research-based practices across the curriculum. Knoxville: Pearson Education Inc.
[4]
Baker, J. (2010). Differences in reading fluency between first grade students in trusted with saxon phonics vs harcourt trophies. New Jersey: Tennesse Technological University Press.
[5]
Baron, J. (1979). Orthographic and word-specific knowledge in children’s reading of words. Child Development, 50, 60-72.
[6]
Behavioral Research and Teaching. (2004). 175, Faculty of Education. University of Oregon.
[7]
Below, J. L., Skinner, H. C., Fearrington, Y. J. & Sorell, A. C. (2010). Gender differences in early literacy: Analysis of kindergarten through fifth grade dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills probes. School Psychology Review, 39(2), 240-257.
[8]
Breznitz, Z. (2006). Fluency in reading. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
[9]
Chard, D.J., Simmons, D.C. & Kameenui, E.J. (1998). Word recognition: Research bases. In D.C. Simmons & E.J. Kameenui (Eds). What reading research tells us about children with diverse learning needs: Bases and basics (141-168). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[10]
Dale, E. & Chall, J.S. (1995). Readability revisited: The new dale-chall readability formula. Educational Research Bulletin, 78, 214-223.
[11]
Davies, A. (1984). Simple, simplified and simplification: What is authentic? In J. C. Alderson & A.H. Urquhart (Eds.). Reading in a foreign language. London: Longman.
[12]
DeKeyser, R. (2007). Conclusion: Automaticity and automatozation. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (125-151). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[13]
Ehri, L.C. & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of word learning: Implication for instruction with delayed and disabled readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 14(2), 135-164.
[14]
Ellis, N.C. & A. Beaton. (1993). Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46A: 533-558.
[15]
Ellis, A.W. & Young, A.W. (1988). Human cognitive neuropsychology. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[16]
Farmer, C., Nixon, K. & White, M. (1976). Theory and practice in applied linguistics. London: Longman
[17]
Farstrup, A.E. & Samuels, S.J. (2002). What research has to say about reading instruction? Newark: International Reading Association.
[18]
Galletly, S.A., Galletly, T.A., Knight, B.A. & Dekkers, J. (2009). Indicators of late emerging reading-accuracy difficulties in australian schools. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 34(5), 54-64.
[19]
Gibson, E.J. & Levin, H. (1975). On the perception of words: An application of some basic concepts. In E.J. Gibson & H. Levin, The psychology of reading. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
[20]
Hager, A. (2001). Techniques for teaching beginning-level reading to adults. Focus on Basics (5).
[21]
Hayes, Gary, T. W. & Zoe, L. (1994). Gender differences in adult readers: A process perspective. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 26(3), 421-437.
[22]
Hudson, R.F., Lane, H.B., & Pullen, P.C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how. The Reading Teacher, 58(8), 702-714.
[23]
Ilyin, Donna, Spurling, Steven & Seymour, Sharon. (1983). Do adults do it differently? Paper presented at the 17th Annual TESOL Convention, Toronto. March 1983.
[24]
Knight, B.A. & Galletly, S.A. (2006). The test of word reading efficiency (TOWRE) used in an australian context. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11(3), 139-146.
[25]
Kruidenier, J. (2002). Research-based principles for adult basic education reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
[26]
Kuhn, M.R., Rasinski, T., & Schwanenflugel, P.J. (2007). Best practices in fluency instruction. In L. Gambrell, L. Morrow, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction. New York: Guilford Press.
[27]
Leach, J.M., Scarborough, H.S. & Rescoria, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 211-224.
[28]
Thompson, B.G. (1987). Three studies of predicted gender differences in processes of word reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 80(4), 212-219.
[29]
McAlpine, R. (2004). Global english for global business. NY: Academic Press.
[30]
Morton, J. & Patterson, K. (1980). “Little words – No!” In M. Colheart, K. Patterson & J.C. Marshall (Eds). Deep dyslexia (270-288). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[31]
National Assessment Governing Board (2002). Reading Framework for the 2003 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Retrieved from: http://www.nagb.org/pub/reading framework/toc.html.
[32]
National Education Monitoring Project. (2004). Forum Comment: 2004 Assessment Reports. Dunedin: Education Assessment Unit, University of Otago.
[33]
Palmer, J., Macleod, C., Hunt, E., & Davidson, J. (1985). Information-processing correlates of reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 59-88.
[34]
Patterson, K.E. (1981). Neuropsychologist approaches to the study of reading. British Journal of Psychology, 72, 151-174.
[35]
Perfetti, C.A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357-383.
[36]
Perfetti, C.A. (1988). Verbal efficiency in reading ability. In M. Daneman, G.E. Mackinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, 109-143. New York: Academic Press
[37]
Rasinski, T.V. (2003). The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency and comprehension. New York: Scholastic.
[38]
Rasinski, T.V. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
[39]
Rasinski, T.V., & Padak, N.D. (2001). From phonics to fluency: Effective teaching of decoding and reading fluency in the elementary school. New York: Longman.
[40]
Rasinski, T.V., Blachowicz, Camille & Lems, Kristin. (2006). Fluency instruction: research-based best practices. New York: The Guilford Press.
[41]
Rasinski, T.V., Rikli, A., & Johnston, S. (2009). Reading Fluency: More than automaticity? More than a concern for the primary grades? Literacy Research and Instruction, 48(4), 350-361.
[42]
Reutzel, D.R. (2003). Organizing effective literacy instruction: Grouping strategies and instructional routines. In L.M. Morrow, L.B. Gambrell, & M. Pressley (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (2nd ed., 241-267). New York: Guilford.
[43]
Rodgers, T.S. (1969). On measuring vocabulary difficulty: An analysis of item variables in learning russian-english vocabulary pairs. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 7, 327-343.
[44]
Samuels, S.J. (2006). Towards a model of reading fluency: What research has to say about fluency instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
[45]
Segalowitz, N. (2000). Automaticity and attentional skill in fluent performance. In H. Roggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on Fluency (200-219). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
[46]
Sebesta, L.S. (1964). The first R: Readings on teaching reading. Michigan: Science Research Associates.
[47]
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading. Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
[48]
Torgesen, J.K., Rashotee, C.A., & Alexander, A.W. (2001). Principles of fluency instruction in reading: Relationships with established empirical outcomes. In M. Wolf (Ed.), Dyslexia, fluency, and the brain. Timonium MD: York Press.
[49]
Walczyk, J.J. (2000). The interplay between automatic and control process in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 554-566.
[50]
Whitaker, H.A. (1983). Towards a brain model of automatization: A short essay. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and Control of Action (199-214). New York: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Open Science Scholarly Journals
Open Science is a peer-reviewed platform, the journals of which cover a wide range of academic disciplines and serve the world's research and scholarly communities. Upon acceptance, Open Science Journals will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.
CONTACT US
Office Address:
228 Park Ave., S#45956, New York, NY 10003
Phone: +(001)(347)535 0661
E-mail:
LET'S GET IN TOUCH
Name
E-mail
Subject
Message
SEND MASSAGE
Copyright © 2013-, Open Science Publishers - All Rights Reserved